activity
20212026
most citedMAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontiers

23 citations · 65 across the 30 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

32 papers

cs.CR2026

Token Rankings are Unforgeable Language Model Signatures

Matthew Finlayson, Andreas Grivas, Xiang Ren +1

Language model parameters are known to impose unique (to each model) geometric constraints on their logit outputs, which serves as a signature that identifies the model, but also l…

cs.CL2026

Side-by-side Comparison Amplifies Dialect Bias in Language Models

Kritee Kondapally, Claire J. Smerdon, Pooja C. Patel +5

Language models (LMs) can exhibit biases based on variations in their dialects, even in the absence of a dialect label, a behavior known as covert dialect bias. In this work, we qu…

cs.CL2026

BenchBrowser: Retrieving Evidence for Evaluating Benchmark Validity

Harshita Diddee, Gregory Yauney, Swabha Swayamdipta +1

Do language model benchmarks actually measure what practitioners intend them to ? High-level metadata is too coarse to convey the granular reality of benchmarks: a "poetry" benchma…

cs.CL2026

Why Fine-Tuning Encourages Hallucinations and How to Fix It

Guy Kaplan, Zorik Gekhman, Zhen Zhu +5

Large language models are prone to hallucinating factually incorrect statements. A key source of these errors is exposure to new factual information through supervised fine-tuning…

cs.CY2026★ 1 cited

Beyond Explainable AI (XAI): An Overdue Paradigm Shift and Post-XAI Research Directions

Saleh Afroogh, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Petra Ahrweiler +46

This study provides a cross-disciplinary examination of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches-focusing on deep neural networks (DNNs) and large language models (LLMs…

cs.CL2026

Disentangling Geometry, Performance, and Training in Language Models

Atharva Kulkarni, Jacob Mitchell Springer, Arjun Subramonian +1

Geometric properties of Transformer weights, particularly the unembedding matrix, have been widely useful in language model interpretability research. Yet, their utility for estima…

cs.AI2025

ChEmREF: Evaluating Language Model Readiness for Chemical Emergency Response

Risha Surana, Qinyuan Ye, Swabha Swayamdipta

Emergency responders managing hazardous material HAZMAT incidents face critical, time-sensitive decisions, manually navigating extensive chemical guidelines. We investigate whether…

cs.CR2025

Every Language Model Has a Forgery-Resistant Signature

Matthew Finlayson, Xiang Ren, Swabha Swayamdipta

The ubiquity of closed-weight language models with public-facing APIs has generated interest in forensic methods, both for extracting hidden model details (e.g., parameters) and fo…

cs.CL2025

Believing without Seeing: Quality Scores for Contextualizing Vision-Language Model Explanations

Keyu He, Tejas Srinivasan, Brihi Joshi +3

When people query Vision-Language Models (VLMs) but cannot see the accompanying visual context (e.g. for blind and low-vision users), augmenting VLM predictions with natural langua…

cs.CL2025

ELI-Why: Evaluating the Pedagogical Utility of Language Model Explanations

Brihi Joshi, Keyu He, Sahana Ramnath +5

Language models today are widely used in education, yet their ability to tailor responses for learners with varied informational needs and knowledge backgrounds remains under-explo…

cs.CL2025

Better Language Model Inversion by Compactly Representing Next-Token Distributions

Murtaza Nazir, Matthew Finlayson, John X. Morris +2

Language model inversion seeks to recover hidden prompts using only language model outputs. This capability has implications for security and accountability in language model deplo…

cs.CL2025

Improving Language Model Personas via Rationalization with Psychological Scaffolds

Brihi Joshi, Xiang Ren, Swabha Swayamdipta +2

Language models prompted with a user description or persona are being used to predict the user's preferences and opinions. However, existing approaches to building personas mostly…

cs.CL2025

Teaching Models to Understand (but not Generate) High-risk Data

Ryan Wang, Matthew Finlayson, Luca Soldaini +2

Language model developers typically filter out high-risk content -- such as toxic or copyrighted text -- from their pre-training data to prevent models from generating similar outp…

cs.CL2025★ 6 cited

Evaluating Evaluation Metrics -- The Mirage of Hallucination Detection

Atharva Kulkarni, Yuan Zhang, Joel Ruben Antony Moniz +5

Hallucinations pose a significant obstacle to the reliability and widespread adoption of language models, yet their accurate measurement remains a persistent challenge. While many…

cs.CY2025★ 1 cited

On the Trustworthiness of Generative Foundation Models: Guideline, Assessment, and Perspective

Yue Huang, Chujie Gao, Siyuan Wu +63

Generative Foundation Models (GenFMs) have emerged as transformative tools. However, their widespread adoption raises critical concerns regarding trustworthiness across dimensions.…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

Political-LLM: Large Language Models in Political Science

Lincan Li, Jiaqi Li, Catherine Chen +44

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in political science tasks such as election prediction, sentiment analysis, policy impact assessment, and mis…

cs.CL2024

Crowd-Calibrator: Can Annotator Disagreement Inform Calibration in Subjective Tasks?

Urja Khurana, Eric Nalisnick, Antske Fokkens +1

Subjective tasks in NLP have been mostly relegated to objective standards, where the gold label is decided by taking the majority vote. This obfuscates annotator disagreement and t…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Logits of API-Protected LLMs Leak Proprietary Information

Matthew Finlayson, Xiang Ren, Swabha Swayamdipta

Large language model (LLM) providers often hide the architectural details and parameters of their proprietary models by restricting public access to a limited API. In this work we…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

Closing the Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration

Matthew Finlayson, John Hewitt, Alexander Koller +2

Despite their ubiquity in language generation, it remains unknown why truncation sampling heuristics like nucleus sampling are so effective. We provide a theoretical explanation fo…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

COBRA Frames: Contextual Reasoning about Effects and Harms of Offensive Statements

Xuhui Zhou, Hao Zhu, Akhila Yerukola +4

Warning: This paper contains content that may be offensive or upsetting. Understanding the harms and offensiveness of statements requires reasoning about the social and situational…

cs.CL2023

NeuroComparatives: Neuro-Symbolic Distillation of Comparative Knowledge

Phillip Howard, Junlin Wang, Vasudev Lal +3

Comparative knowledge (e.g., steel is stronger and heavier than styrofoam) is an essential component of our world knowledge, yet understudied in prior literature. In this paper, we…

cs.CL2023★ 3 cited

We're Afraid Language Models Aren't Modeling Ambiguity

Alisa Liu, Zhaofeng Wu, Julian Michael +6

Ambiguity is an intrinsic feature of natural language. Managing ambiguity is a key part of human language understanding, allowing us to anticipate misunderstanding as communicators…

cs.LG2022★ 5 cited

MAUVE Scores for Generative Models: Theory and Practice

Krishna Pillutla, Lang Liu, John Thickstun +6

Generative artificial intelligence has made significant strides, producing text indistinguishable from human prose and remarkably photorealistic images. Automatically measuring how…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

I2D2: Inductive Knowledge Distillation with NeuroLogic and Self-Imitation

Chandra Bhagavatula, Jena D. Hwang, Doug Downey +7

Commonsense capabilities of pre-trained language models dramatically improve with scale, leading many to believe that scale is the only winning recipe. But is it? Here, we investig…