activity
20242026
most citedWho Evaluates AI's Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage and Gaps in First and Third Party Evaluations

1 citations · 1 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2026

Bye Bye Perspective API: Lessons for Measurement Infrastructure in NLP, CSS and LLM Evaluation

David Hartmann, Manuel Tonneau, Angelie Kraft +7

The closure of Perspective API at the end of 2026 discards what has functioned as the de facto standard for automated toxicity measurement in NLP, CSS, and LLM evaluation research.…

cs.CL2026

One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM Personalization

Franziska Weeber, Vera Neplenbroek, Jan Batzner +1

Personalization of LLMs by sociodemographic subgroup often improves user experience, but can also introduce or amplify biases and unfair outcomes across groups. Prior work has empl…

cs.CL2025

Sycophancy Claims about Language Models: The Missing Human-in-the-Loop

Jan Batzner, Volker Stocker, Stefan Schmid +1

Sycophantic response patterns in Large Language Models (LLMs) have been increasingly claimed in the literature. We review methodological challenges in measuring LLM sycophancy and…

cs.CL2025

Measuring what Matters: Construct Validity in Large Language Model Benchmarks

Andrew M. Bean, Ryan Othniel Kearns, Angelika Romanou +39

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) is crucial for both assessing their capabilities and identifying safety or robustness issues prior to deployment. Reliably measuring abstrac…

cs.CL2024

Immunization against harmful fine-tuning attacks

Domenic Rosati, Jan Wehner, Kai Williams +4

Large Language Models (LLMs) are often trained with safety guards intended to prevent harmful text generation. However, such safety training can be removed by fine-tuning the LLM o…