10 citations · 17 across the 13 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers · 1 filter
Applying Attribution Explanations in Truth-Discovery Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
Xiang Yin, Nico Potyka, Francesca Toni
Explaining the strength of arguments under gradual semantics is receiving increasing attention. For example, various studies in the literature offer explanations by computing the a…
CE-QArg: Counterfactual Explanations for Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (Technical Report)
Xiang Yin, Nico Potyka, Francesca Toni
There is a growing interest in understanding arguments' strength in Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (QBAFs). Most existing studies focus on attribution-based methods…
Explaining Arguments' Strength: Unveiling the Role of Attacks and Supports (Technical Report)
Xiang Yin, Potyka Nico, Francesca Toni
Quantitatively explaining the strength of arguments under gradual semantics has recently received increasing attention. Specifically, several works in the literature provide quanti…
Contestable AI needs Computational Argumentation
Francesco Leofante, Hamed Ayoobi, Adam Dejl +10
AI has become pervasive in recent years, but state-of-the-art approaches predominantly neglect the need for AI systems to be contestable. Instead, contestability is advocated by AI…
Argumentative Large Language Models for Explainable and Contestable Claim Verification
Gabriel Freedman, Adam Dejl, Deniz Gorur +3
The profusion of knowledge encoded in large language models (LLMs) and their ability to apply this knowledge zero-shot in a range of settings makes them promising candidates for us…
Contribution Functions for Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Graphs: A Principle-based Analysis
Timotheus Kampik, Nico Potyka, Xiang Yin +2
We present a principle-based analysis of contribution functions for quantitative bipolar argumentation graphs that quantify the contribution of one argument to another. The introdu…