5 citations · 10 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
OnlineProver: Experience with a Visualisation Tool for Teaching Formal Proofs
Ján Perháč, Samuel Novotný, Sergej Chodarev +4
OnlineProver is an interactive proof assistant tailored for the educational setting. Its main features include a user-friendly interface for editing and checking proofs. The user i…
pun: Fun with Properties; Towards a Programming Language With Built-in Facilities for Program Validation
Triera Gashi, Sophie Adeline Solheim Bosio, Joachim Tilsted Kristensen +1
Property-based testing is a powerful method to validate program correctness. It is, however, not widely use in industry as the barrier of entry can be very high. One of the hindran…
Tail recursion transformation for invertible functions
Joachim Tilsted Kristensen, Robin Kaarsgaard, Michael Kirkedal Thomsen
Tail recursive functions allow for a wider range of optimisations than general recursive functions. For this reason, much research has gone into the transformation and optimisation…
Branching execution symmetry in Jeopardy by available implicit arguments analysis
Joachim Tilsted Kristensen, Robin Kaarsgaard, Michael Kirkedal Thomsen
When the inverse of an algorithm is well-defined -- that is, when its output can be deterministically transformed into the input producing it -- we say that the algorithm is invert…
Jeopardy: An Invertible Functional Programming Language
Joachim Tilsted Kristensen, Robin Kaarsgaard, Michael Kirkedal Thomsen
Algorithms are ways of mapping problems to solutions. An algorithm is invertible precisely when this mapping is injective, such that the initial problem can be uniquely inferred fr…