most citedThe FluidFlower International Benchmark Study: Process, Modeling Results, and Comparison to Experimental Data

11 citations · 15 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cond-mat.soft2023

Soft matter physics of the ground beneath our feet

Anne Voigtländer, Morgane Houssais, Karol A. Bacik +24

Inspired by presentations by the authors during a workshop organized at the Princeton Center for Theoretical Science (PCTS) in January 2022, we present a perspective on some of the…

physics.geo-ph202311 cited

The FluidFlower International Benchmark Study: Process, Modeling Results, and Comparison to Experimental Data

Bernd Flemisch, Jan M. Nordbotten, Martin Fernø +30

Successful deployment of geological carbon storage (GCS) requires an extensive use of reservoir simulators for screening, ranking and optimization of storage sites. However, the ti…

physics.flu-dyn20232 cited

Direct comparison of numerical simulations and experiments of CO injection and migration in geologic media: Value of local data and predictability

Lluís Saló-Salgado, Malin Haugen, Kristoffer Eikehaug +3

The accuracy and robustness of numerical models of geologic CO sequestration are almost never quantified with respect to direct observations that provide a ground truth. Here,…

physics.geo-ph20232 cited

Physical variability in meter-scale laboratory CO injections in faulted geometries

Malin Haugen, Lluis Salo-Salgado, Kristoffer Eikehaug +7

Carbon, capture, and storage (CCS) is an important bridging technology to combat climate change in the transition towards net-zero. The FluidFlower concept has been developed to vi…

cond-mat.soft2022

Fluid-fluid displacement in mixed-wet porous media

Ashkan Irannezhad, Bauyrzhan K. Primkulov, Ruben Juanes +1

It is well-known that wettability exerts fundamental control over multiphase flow in porous media, which has been extensively studied in uniform-wet porous media. In contrast, mult…