1 citations · 1 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers · 1 filter
DualEval: Joint Model-Item Calibration for Unified LLM Evaluation
Aaron J. Li, Hao Huang, Youngmin Park +6
Current LLM evaluation relies on two complementary but often disconnected signals: static benchmarks with objective correctness labels and arena-style preference data that better r…
Prompt-to-Leaderboard
Evan Frick, Connor Chen, Joseph Tennyson +4
Large language model (LLM) evaluations typically rely on aggregated metrics like accuracy or human preference, averaging across users and prompts. This averaging obscures user- and…
RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Data
Isaac Ong, Amjad Almahairi, Vincent Wu +5
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive capabilities across a wide range of tasks, yet the choice of which model to use often involves a trade-off between performance and c…
Exploring and Mitigating Adversarial Manipulation of Voting-Based Leaderboards
Yangsibo Huang, Milad Nasr, Anastasios Angelopoulos +10
It is now common to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) by having humans manually vote to evaluate model outputs, in contrast to typical benchmarks that evaluate knowledge or ski…
How to Evaluate Reward Models for RLHF
Evan Frick, Tianle Li, Connor Chen +6
We introduce a new benchmark for reward models that quantifies their ability to produce strong language models through RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback). The gold-s…
From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipeline
Tianle Li, Wei-Lin Chiang, Evan Frick +5
The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has outpaced the development of model evaluation, highlighting the need for continuous curation of new, challenging benchmarks.…