1 citations · 1 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
CLExEval: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Qualitative Evaluation of LLM Clinical Reasoning
Ajmal M., Abin Roy, Afthab Salam Kanniyan +4
Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong results on many medical benchmarks, but their clinical reasoning remains difficult to evaluate reliably. A central risk is an evaluation…
TLPO: Token-Level Policy Optimization for Mitigating Language Confusion in Large Language Models
Jinho Choo, JunSeung Lee, Jimyeong Kim +3
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong multilingual capabilities, yet often fail to consistently generate responses in the intended language, exhibiting a phenomenon known…
On Safety Risks in Experience-Driven Self-Evolving Agents
Weixiang Zhao, Yichen Zhang, Yingshuo Wang +8
Experience-driven self-evolution has emerged as a promising paradigm for improving the autonomy of large language model agents, yet its reliance on self-curated experience introduc…
D-REX: A Benchmark for Detecting Deceptive Reasoning in Large Language Models
Satyapriya Krishna, Andy Zou, Rahul Gupta +6
The safety and alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) are critical for their responsible deployment. Current evaluation methods predominantly focus on identifying and preventing…
When Benchmarks are Targets: Revealing the Sensitivity of Large Language Model Leaderboards
Norah Alzahrani, Hisham Abdullah Alyahya, Yazeed Alnumay +9
Large Language Model (LLM) leaderboards based on benchmark rankings are regularly used to guide practitioners in model selection. Often, the published leaderboard rankings are take…