most citedResponse to a comment on Dessert et al. "The dark matter interpretation of the 3.5 keV line is inconsistent with blank-sky observations"

15 citations · 15 across the 1 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

1 paper

astro-ph.CO2020★ 15 cited

Response to a comment on Dessert et al. "The dark matter interpretation of the 3.5 keV line is inconsistent with blank-sky observations"

Christopher Dessert, Nicholas L. Rodd, Benjamin R. Safdi

The dark matter explanation of the 3.5 keV line is strongly disfavored by our work in Dessert et al. 2020. Boyarsky et al. 2020 questions that conclusion: modeling additional backg…