activity
20242026
collaborators

6 papers

cs.DL2026

Does ChatGPT score research quality differently by gender?

Kayvan Kousha, Mike Thelwall

Large Language Models (LLMs) are being considered for research evaluation, raising concerns about the introduction of AI bias. This study investigates whether ChatGPT research qual…

cs.DL2026

Have LLM-associated terms increased in article full texts in all fields?

Mike Thelwall, Kayvan Kousha

The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and DeepSeek for translation and language polishing is a welcome development, reducing the longstanding publishing barrier to n…

cs.DL2026

Which stylistic features fool ChatGPT research evaluations?

Kayvan Kousha, Mike Thelwall

Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to be used to support research evaluation and have a moderate capability to estimate the research quality of a journal article from…

cs.DL2026

How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysis

Kayvan Kousha, Mike Thelwall

This study investigates how Large Language Models (LLMs) are influencing the language of academic papers by tracking 12 LLM-associated terms across six major scholarly databases (S…

cs.DL2025

Can ChatGPT evaluate research environments? Evidence from REF2021

Kayvan Kousha, Mike Thelwall, Elizabeth Gadd

UK academic departments are evaluated partly on the statements that they write about the value of their research environments for the Research Excellence Framework (REF) periodic a…

cs.DL2024

Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: More meaningful than Impact Factors?

Mike Thelwall, Kayvan Kousha

Purpose: Journal Impact Factors and other citation-based indicators are widely used and abused to help select journals to publish in or to estimate the value of a published article…