activity
20222026
most citedChatGPT: A Meta-Analysis after 2.5 Months

23 citations · 48 across the 17 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

13 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2026

When Writing Style Drifts: Benchmarking Authorship Verification under Distribution Shifts in Genre, Time and the AI-Era

Lotta Kiefer, Brisca Balthes, Christoph Leiter +3

Authorship verification (AV) assumes that an author's writing style remains sufficiently stable to distinguish it from that of other writers. In practice, however, this assumption…

cs.CL2026

Who Annotates in NLP? A Large-scale Assessment of Human Annotation Reporting between 2018 and 2025

Maria Kunilovskaya, Gagan Bhatia, Lisa Sophie Albertelli +10

Human annotation is the empirical foundation of much NLP research, from dataset construction to model evaluation, but papers often leave unclear who produced the annotations and ho…

cs.CL2026

ValueGround: Evaluating Culture-Conditioned Visual Value Grounding in MLLMs

Zhipin Wang, Christoph Leiter, Christian Frey +3

Cultural values are expressed not only through language but also through visual scenes and everyday social practices. Yet existing evaluations of cultural values in language models…

cs.CL2026

ExCAM: Explainable Cultural Awareness Metrics

Christoph Leiter, Haiyue Song, Hour Kaing +4

Evaluating the cultural awareness of large language models is crucial to ensure the fairness of generated text and the generalizability of applications across the world. Recent ben…

cs.CL2026

GerAV: Towards New Heights in German Authorship Verification using Fine-Tuned LLMs on a New Benchmark

Lotta Kiefer, Christoph Leiter, Sotaro Takeshita +2

Authorship verification (AV) is the task of determining whether two texts were written by the same author and has been studied extensively, predominantly for English data. In contr…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

DeepSeek-R1 vs. o3-mini: How Well can Reasoning LLMs Evaluate MT and Summarization?

Daniil Larionov, Sotaro Takeshita, Ran Zhang +5

Reasoning-enabled large language models (LLMs) excel in logical tasks, yet their utility for evaluating natural language generation remains unexplored. This study systematically co…

cs.CL2024

PrExMe! Large Scale Prompt Exploration of Open Source LLMs for Machine Translation and Summarization Evaluation

Christoph Leiter, Steffen Eger

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized NLP research. Notably, in-context learning enables their use as evaluation metrics for natural language generation, making them par…

cs.CL2023

The Eval4NLP 2023 Shared Task on Prompting Large Language Models as Explainable Metrics

Christoph Leiter, Juri Opitz, Daniel Deutsch +3

With an increasing number of parameters and pre-training data, generative large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities to solve tasks with minimal or no task-rel…

cs.CL2023★ 6 cited

Towards Explainable Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translation

Christoph Leiter, Piyawat Lertvittayakumjorn, Marina Fomicheva +3

Unlike classical lexical overlap metrics such as BLEU, most current evaluation metrics for machine translation (for example, COMET or BERTScore) are based on black-box large langua…

cs.CL2023★ 23 cited

ChatGPT: A Meta-Analysis after 2.5 Months

Christoph Leiter, Ran Zhang, Yanran Chen +4

ChatGPT, a chatbot developed by OpenAI, has gained widespread popularity and media attention since its release in November 2022. However, little hard evidence is available regardin…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

BMX: Boosting Natural Language Generation Metrics with Explainability

Christoph Leiter, Hoa Nguyen, Steffen Eger

State-of-the-art natural language generation evaluation metrics are based on black-box language models. Hence, recent works consider their explainability with the goals of better u…

cs.CL2022★ 2 cited

EffEval: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Efficiency for MT Evaluation Metrics

Daniil Larionov, Jens Grünwald, Christoph Leiter +1

Efficiency is a key property to foster inclusiveness and reduce environmental costs, especially in an era of LLMs. In this work, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of efficiency…

cs.CL2022★ 12 cited

Towards Explainable Evaluation Metrics for Natural Language Generation

Christoph Leiter, Piyawat Lertvittayakumjorn, Marina Fomicheva +3

Unlike classical lexical overlap metrics such as BLEU, most current evaluation metrics (such as BERTScore or MoverScore) are based on black-box language models such as BERT or XLM-…