1 citations · 1 across the 2 of their papers we have counts for
4 papers
Flee the Flaw: Annotating the Underlying Logic of Fallacious Arguments Through Templates and Slot-filling
Irfan Robbani, Paul Reisert, Naoya Inoue +6
Prior research in computational argumentation has mainly focused on scoring the quality of arguments, with less attention on explicating logical errors. In this work, we introduce…
Teach Me How to Improve My Argumentation Skills: A Survey on Feedback in Argumentation
Camélia Guerraoui, Paul Reisert, Naoya Inoue +6
The use of argumentation in education has been shown to improve critical thinking skills for end-users such as students, and computational models for argumentation have been develo…
LPAttack: A Feasible Annotation Scheme for Capturing Logic Pattern of Attacks in Arguments
Farjana Sultana Mim, Naoya Inoue, Shoichi Naito +2
In argumentative discourse, persuasion is often achieved by refuting or attacking others arguments. Attacking is not always straightforward and often comprise complex rhetorical mo…
TYPIC: A Corpus of Template-Based Diagnostic Comments on Argumentation
Shoichi Naito, Shintaro Sawada, Chihiro Nakagawa +6
Providing feedback on the argumentation of the learner is essential for developing critical thinking skills, however, it requires a lot of time and effort. To mitigate the overload…