activity
20212024
most citedAutoDOViz: Human-Centered Automation for Decision Optimization

10 citations · 15 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.HC20241 cited

Human-Centered Design Recommendations for LLM-as-a-Judge

Qian Pan, Zahra Ashktorab, Michael Desmond +5

Traditional reference-based metrics, such as BLEU and ROUGE, are less effective for assessing outputs from Large Language Models (LLMs) that produce highly creative or superior-qua…

cs.AI2023

Iterative Reward Shaping using Human Feedback for Correcting Reward Misspecification

Jasmina Gajcin, James McCarthy, Rahul Nair +3

A well-defined reward function is crucial for successful training of an reinforcement learning (RL) agent. However, defining a suitable reward function is a notoriously challenging…

cs.HC202310 cited

AutoDOViz: Human-Centered Automation for Decision Optimization

Daniel Karl I. Weidele, Shazia Afzal, Abel N. Valente +12

We present AutoDOViz, an interactive user interface for automated decision optimization (AutoDO) using reinforcement learning (RL). Decision optimization (DO) has classically being…

cs.LG20221 cited

Boolean Decision Rules for Reinforcement Learning Policy Summarisation

James McCarthy, Rahul Nair, Elizabeth Daly +2

Explainability of Reinforcement Learning (RL) policies remains a challenging research problem, particularly when considering RL in a safety context. Understanding the decisions and…

cs.AI20213 cited

Contrastive Explanations for Comparing Preferences of Reinforcement Learning Agents

Jasmina Gajcin, Rahul Nair, Tejaswini Pedapati +3

In complex tasks where the reward function is not straightforward and consists of a set of objectives, multiple reinforcement learning (RL) policies that perform task adequately, b…