2 citations · 5 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers
ARGUS: Seeing the Influence of Narrative Features on Persuasion in Argumentative Texts
Sara Nabhani, Federico Pianzola, Khalid Al-Khatib +1
Can narratives make arguments more persuasive? And to this end, which narrative features matter most? Although stories are often seen as powerful tools for persuasion, their specif…
Toward Reasonable Parrots: Why Large Language Models Should Argue with Us by Design
Elena Musi, Nadin Kokciyan, Khalid Al-Khatib +10
In this position paper, we advocate for the development of conversational technology that is inherently designed to support and facilitate argumentative processes. We argue that, a…
Language is Scary when Over-Analyzed: Unpacking Implied Misogynistic Reasoning with Argumentation Theory-Driven Prompts
Arianna Muti, Federico Ruggeri, Khalid Al-Khatib +2
We propose misogyny detection as an Argumentative Reasoning task and we investigate the capacity of large language models (LLMs) to understand the implicit reasoning used to convey…
Citance-Contextualized Summarization of Scientific Papers
Shahbaz Syed, Ahmad Dawar Hakimi, Khalid Al-Khatib +1
Current approaches to automatic summarization of scientific papers generate informative summaries in the form of abstracts. However, abstracts are not intended to show the relation…
Differential Bias: On the Perceptibility of Stance Imbalance in Argumentation
Alonso Palomino, Martin Potthast, Khalid Al-Khatib +1
Most research on natural language processing treats bias as an absolute concept: Based on a (probably complex) algorithmic analysis, a sentence, an article, or a text is classified…
Generating Informative Conclusions for Argumentative Texts
Shahbaz Syed, Khalid Al-Khatib, Milad Alshomary +2
The purpose of an argumentative text is to support a certain conclusion. Yet, they are often omitted, expecting readers to infer them rather. While appropriate when reading an indi…