activity
20212025
most citedAutomatic Summarization of Russian Texts: Comparison of Extractive and Abstractive Methods

6 citations · 7 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.CL2025

Talking to Data: Designing Smart Assistants for Humanities Databases

Alexander Sergeev, Valeriya Goloviznina, Mikhail Melnichenko +1

Access to humanities research databases is often hindered by the limitations of traditional interaction formats, particularly in the methods of searching and response generation. T…

cs.CL2025

Do LLMs Understand Why We Write Diaries? A Method for Purpose Extraction and Clustering

Valeriya Goloviznina, Alexander Sergeev, Mikhail Melnichenko +1

Diary analysis presents challenges, particularly in extracting meaningful information from large corpora, where traditional methods often fail to deliver satisfactory results. This…

cs.CL2024

I've got the "Answer"! Interpretation of LLMs Hidden States in Question Answering

Valeriya Goloviznina, Evgeny Kotelnikov

Interpretability and explainability of AI are becoming increasingly important in light of the rapid development of large language models (LLMs). This paper investigates the interpr…

cs.CL2022★ 6 cited

Automatic Summarization of Russian Texts: Comparison of Extractive and Abstractive Methods

Valeriya Goloviznina, Evgeny Kotelnikov

The development of large and super-large language models, such as GPT-3, T5, Switch Transformer, ERNIE, etc., has significantly improved the performance of text generation. One of…

cs.CL2021★ 1 cited

Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Argumentation Mining in Russian Texts

Irina Fishcheva, Valeriya Goloviznina, Evgeny Kotelnikov

Argumentation mining is a field of computational linguistics that is devoted to extracting from texts and classifying arguments and relations between them, as well as constructing…