41 citations · 112 across the 17 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
On Evaluating the Durability of Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMs
Xiangyu Qi, Boyi Wei, Nicholas Carlini +7
Stakeholders -- from model developers to policymakers -- seek to minimize the dual-use risks of large language models (LLMs). An open challenge to this goal is whether technical sa…
Lottery Ticket Adaptation: Mitigating Destructive Interference in LLMs
Ashwinee Panda, Berivan Isik, Xiangyu Qi +3
Existing methods for adapting large language models (LLMs) to new tasks are not suited to multi-task adaptation because they modify all the model weights -- causing destructive int…
Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep
Xiangyu Qi, Ashwinee Panda, Kaifeng Lyu +5
The safety alignment of current Large Language Models (LLMs) is vulnerable. Relatively simple attacks, or even benign fine-tuning, can jailbreak aligned models. We argue that many…
SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusal
Tinghao Xie, Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng +13
Evaluating aligned large language models' (LLMs) ability to recognize and reject unsafe user requests is crucial for safe, policy-compliant deployments. Existing evaluation efforts…
Assessing the Brittleness of Safety Alignment via Pruning and Low-Rank Modifications
Boyi Wei, Kaixuan Huang, Yangsibo Huang +6
Large language models (LLMs) show inherent brittleness in their safety mechanisms, as evidenced by their susceptibility to jailbreaking and even non-malicious fine-tuning. This stu…