74 citations · 80 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers
Don't blame me: How Intelligent Support Affects Moral Responsibility in Human Oversight
Cedric Faas, Richard Uth, Sarah Sterz +2
AI-based systems can increasingly perform work tasks autonomously. In safety-critical tasks, human oversight of these systems is required to mitigate risks and to ensure responsibi…
Give Me a Choice: The Consequences of Restricting Choices Through AI-Support for Perceived Autonomy, Motivational Variables, and Decision Performance
Cedric Faas, Richard Bergs, Sarah Sterz +2
Design optimizations in human-AI collaboration often focus on cognitive aspects like attention and task load. Drawing on work design literature, we propose that effective human-AI…
AI Act for the Working Programmer
Holger Hermanns, Anne Lauber-Rönsberg, Philip Meinel +2
The European AI Act is a new, legally binding instrument that will enforce certain requirements on the development and use of AI technology potentially affecting people in Europe.…
On the Quest for Effectiveness in Human Oversight: Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Sarah Sterz, Kevin Baum, Sebastian Biewer +4
Human oversight is currently discussed as a potential safeguard to counter some of the negative aspects of high-risk AI applications. This prompts a critical examination of the rol…
Software Doping Analysis for Human Oversight
Sebastian Biewer, Kevin Baum, Sarah Sterz +5
This article introduces a framework that is meant to assist in mitigating societal risks that software can pose. Concretely, this encompasses facets of software doping as well as u…
On the Relation of Trust and Explainability: Why to Engineer for Trustworthiness
Lena Kästner, Markus Langer, Veronika Lazar +3
Recently, requirements for the explainability of software systems have gained prominence. One of the primary motivators for such requirements is that explainability is expected to…