activity
20212026
most citedQueer In AI: A Case Study in Community-Led Participatory AI

65 citations · 68 across the 12 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

12 papers

cs.CY2026

Challenges to Grassroots Organization Engagement with AI Policy

Carter Buckner, Jennifer Mickel, Nandhini Swaminathan +6

Public policies are being developed around the world to address privacy, economic, intellectual property, energy, and other risks that AI technologies pose. Involvement from the ge…

cs.AI2026

Bayesian Inference and Decision Audits for Public Archives of Frontier AI Evaluations

Yanan Long

Public AI evaluations are often read as terminal leaderboards, yet the underlying evidence is a selective time series shaped by reporting rules, benchmark revisions, and missingnes…

cs.AI2026

Every Eval Ever: A Unifying Schema and Community Repository for AI Evaluation Results

Jan Batzner, Sree Harsha Nelaturu, Damian Stachura +45

AI evaluations are widely used for testing and understanding progress. However, the diverse evaluators bring with them inconsistencies that challenge analysis and comparison. First…

cs.AI2026

Evaluation Cards: An Interpretive Layer for AI Evaluation Reporting

Avijit Ghosh, Anka Reuel, Jenny Chim +45

AI evaluation results are produced at scale but reported inconsistently across leaderboards, model cards, benchmark papers, and company blogs. The cost is interpretive: readers can…

cs.HC2026

"Taking Stock at FAccT": Using Participatory Design to Co-Create a Vision for the Fairness, Accountability and Transparency Community

Shiran Dudy, Jan Simson, Yanan Long

As a relatively new forum, ACM FAccT has become a key space for activists and scholars to critically examine emerging AI and ML technologies. It brings together academics, civil so…

cs.AI2026★ 2 cited

When AI Benchmarks Plateau: A Systematic Study of Benchmark Saturation

Mubashara Akhtar, Anka Reuel, Prajna Soni +34

Artificial intelligence benchmarks are an important mechanism to measure model progress and guide deployment decisions. However, benchmarks quickly "saturate", making it difficult…

cs.CY2026

Queer NLP: A Critical Survey on Literature Gaps, Biases and Trends

Sabine Weber, Angelina Wang, Ankush Gupta +16

Natural language processing (NLP) technologies are rapidly reshaping how language is created, processed, and interpreted by humans. With current and potential applications in hirin…

cs.CL2025

Triangulation as an Acceptance Rule for Multilingual Mechanistic Interpretability

Yanan Long

Multilingual language models achieve strong aggregate performance yet often behave unpredictably across languages, scripts, and cultures. We argue that mechanistic explanations for…

cs.CY2025★ 1 cited

Who Evaluates AI's Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage and Gaps in First and Third Party Evaluations

Anka Reuel, Avijit Ghosh, Jenny Chim +32

Foundation models are increasingly central to high-stakes AI systems, and governance frameworks now depend on evaluations to assess their risks and capabilities. Although general c…

cs.AI2025

Embracing Ambiguity: Bayesian Nonparametrics and Stakeholder Participation for Ambiguity-Aware Safety Evaluation

Yanan Long

Evaluations of generative AI models often collapse nuanced behaviour into a single number computed for a single decoding configuration. Such point estimates obscure tail risks, dem…

cs.CY2023★ 65 cited

Queer In AI: A Case Study in Community-Led Participatory AI

Organizers Of QueerInAI, :, Anaelia Ovalle +48

We present Queer in AI as a case study for community-led participatory design in AI. We examine how participatory design and intersectional tenets started and shaped this community…

cs.CG2021

ICLR 2021 Challenge for Computational Geometry & Topology: Design and Results

Nina Miolane, Matteo Caorsi, Umberto Lupo +30

This paper presents the computational challenge on differential geometry and topology that happened within the ICLR 2021 workshop "Geometric and Topological Representation Learning…