1 citations · 1 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
From Argumentation to Deliberation: Perspectivized Stance Vectors for Fine-grained (Dis)agreement Analysis
Moritz Plenz, Philipp Heinisch, Janosch Gehring +2
Debating over conflicting issues is a necessary first step towards resolving conflicts. However, intrinsic perspectives of an arguer are difficult to overcome by persuasive argumen…
PAKT: Perspectivized Argumentation Knowledge Graph and Tool for Deliberation Analysis (with Supplementary Materials)
Moritz Plenz, Philipp Heinisch, Anette Frank +1
Deliberative processes play a vital role in shaping opinions, decisions and policies in our society. In contrast to persuasive debates, deliberation aims to foster understanding of…
Architectural Sweet Spots for Modeling Human Label Variation by the Example of Argument Quality: It's Best to Relate Perspectives!
Philipp Heinisch, Matthias Orlikowski, Julia Romberg +1
Many annotation tasks in natural language processing are highly subjective in that there can be different valid and justified perspectives on what is a proper label for a given exa…
Similarity-weighted Construction of Contextualized Commonsense Knowledge Graphs for Knowledge-intense Argumentation Tasks
Moritz Plenz, Juri Opitz, Philipp Heinisch +2
Arguments often do not make explicit how a conclusion follows from its premises. To compensate for this lack, we enrich arguments with structured background knowledge to support kn…
Key Point Analysis via Contrastive Learning and Extractive Argument Summarization
Milad Alshomary, Timon Gurcke, Shahbaz Syed +5
Key point analysis is the task of extracting a set of concise and high-level statements from a given collection of arguments, representing the gist of these arguments. This paper p…