4 citations · 4 across the 1 of their papers we have counts for
4 papers
A One-Size-Fits-All Approach to Improving Randomness in Paper Assignment
Yixuan Even Xu, Steven Jecmen, Zimeng Song +1
The assignment of papers to reviewers is a crucial part of the peer review processes of large publication venues, where organizers (e.g., conference program chairs) rely on algorit…
Testing for Reviewer Anchoring in Peer Review: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ryan Liu, Steven Jecmen, Vincent Conitzer +2
Peer review frequently follows a process where reviewers first provide initial reviews, authors respond to these reviews, then reviewers update their reviews based on the authors'…
Counterfactual Evaluation of Peer-Review Assignment Policies
Martin Saveski, Steven Jecmen, Nihar B. Shah +1
Peer review assignment algorithms aim to match research papers to suitable expert reviewers, working to maximize the quality of the resulting reviews. A key challenge in designing…
Tradeoffs in Preventing Manipulation in Paper Bidding for Reviewer Assignment
Steven Jecmen, Nihar B. Shah, Fei Fang +1
Many conferences rely on paper bidding as a key component of their reviewer assignment procedure. These bids are then taken into account when assigning reviewers to help ensure tha…