2 citations · 5 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
PluriHarms: Benchmarking the Full Spectrum of Human Judgments on AI Harm
Jing-Jing Li, Joel Mire, Eve Fleisig +4
Current AI safety frameworks, which often treat harmfulness as binary, lack the flexibility to handle borderline cases where humans meaningfully disagree. To build more pluralistic…
Why (not) use AI? Analyzing People's Reasoning and Conditions for AI Acceptability
Jimin Mun, Wei Bin Au Yeong, Wesley Hanwen Deng +2
In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the need to incorporate lay-people's input into the governance and acceptability assessment of AI usage. However, how and w…
SOTOPIA-S4: a user-friendly system for flexible, customizable, and large-scale social simulation
Xuhui Zhou, Zhe Su, Sophie Feng +9
Social simulation through large language model (LLM) agents is a promising approach to explore and validate hypotheses related to social science questions and LLM agents behavior.…
The Generative AI Ethics Playbook
Jessie J. Smith, Wesley Hanwen Deng, William H. Smith +3
The Generative AI Ethics Playbook provides guidance for identifying and mitigating risks of machine learning systems across various domains, including natural language processing,…
Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits
Jimin Mun, Liwei Jiang, Jenny Liang +5
General purpose AI, such as ChatGPT, seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. However, the governance and development of AI still remain i…