141 citations · 348 across the 38 of their papers we have counts for
15 papers · 1 filter
Can AI agents conduct open-ended AI research? Early evidence from two case studies
Peter Kirgis, Sayash Kapoor, Andrew Schwartz +21
Forecasts of explosive AI progress hinge on AI agents automating AI research. But evidence on whether agents can carry out open-ended AI research is thin. Current evaluations eithe…
Life After Benchmark Saturation: A Case Study of CORE-Bench
Nitya Nadgir, Sayash Kapoor, Kangheng Liu +11
When a benchmark's accuracy saturates, it is often retired and replaced with a more challenging version. We show that this approach privileges accuracy and misses the opportunity t…
Open-World Evaluations for Measuring Frontier AI Capabilities
Sayash Kapoor, Peter Kirgis, Andrew Schwartz +15
Benchmark-based evaluation remains important for tracking frontier AI progress. But it can both overstate and understate deployed capability because it privileges tasks that can be…
Log analysis is necessary for credible evaluation of AI agents
Peter Kirgis, Sayash Kapoor, Stephan Rabanser +8
Agent benchmarks typically report only final outcomes: pass or fail. This threatens evaluation credibility in three ways. First, scores may be inflated or deflated by shortcuts and…
Seven simple steps for log analysis in AI systems
Magda Dubois, Ekin Zorer, Maia Hamin +17
AI systems produce large volumes of logs as they interact with tools and users. Analysing these logs can help understand model capabilities, propensities, and behaviours, or assess…
Towards a Science of AI Agent Reliability
Stephan Rabanser, Sayash Kapoor, Peter Kirgis +3
AI agents are increasingly deployed to execute important tasks. While rising accuracy scores on standard benchmarks suggest rapid progress, many agents still continue to fail in pr…
The 2025 Foundation Model Transparency Index
Alexander Wan, Kevin Klyman, Sayash Kapoor +5
Foundation model developers are among the world's most important companies. As these companies become increasingly consequential, how do their transparency practices evolve? The 20…
Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation
Sayash Kapoor, Benedikt Stroebl, Peter Kirgis +28
AI agents have been developed for complex real-world tasks from coding to customer service. But AI agent evaluations suffer from many challenges that undermine our understanding of…
Establishing Best Practices for Building Rigorous Agentic Benchmarks
Yuxuan Zhu, Tengjun Jin, Yada Pruksachatkun +22
Benchmarks are essential for quantitatively tracking progress in AI. As AI agents become increasingly capable, researchers and practitioners have introduced agentic benchmarks to e…
A Different Approach to AI Safety: Proceedings from the Columbia Convening on Openness in Artificial Intelligence and AI Safety
Camille François, Ludovic Péran, Ayah Bdeir +17
The rapid rise of open-weight and open-source foundation models is intensifying the obligation and reshaping the opportunity to make AI systems safe. This paper reports outcomes fr…
The Leaderboard Illusion
Shivalika Singh, Yiyang Nan, Alex Wang +10
Measuring progress is fundamental to the advancement of any scientific field. As benchmarks play an increasingly central role, they also grow more susceptible to distortion. Chatbo…
In-House Evaluation Is Not Enough: Towards Robust Third-Party Flaw Disclosure for General-Purpose AI
Shayne Longpre, Kevin Klyman, Ruth E. Appel +31
The widespread deployment of general-purpose AI (GPAI) systems introduces significant new risks. Yet the infrastructure, practices, and norms for reporting flaws in GPAI systems re…
Toward an Evaluation Science for Generative AI Systems
Laura Weidinger, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Hanna Wallach +7
There is an increasing imperative to anticipate and understand the performance and safety of generative AI systems in real-world deployment contexts. However, the current evaluatio…
The Reality of AI and Biorisk
Aidan Peppin, Anka Reuel, Stephen Casper +10
To accurately and confidently answer the question 'could an AI model or system increase biorisk', it is necessary to have both a sound theoretical threat model for how AI models or…
A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming
Shayne Longpre, Sayash Kapoor, Kevin Klyman +20
Independent evaluation and red teaming are critical for identifying the risks posed by generative AI systems. However, the terms of service and enforcement strategies used by promi…