activity
20242026
collaborators
Showing cs.SEShow all

9 papers · 1 filter

cs.SE2026

OpenCodeReview: Determinism over Non-Determinism for Cost-Effective Agent-Based Code Review

Zhengfeng Li, Lei Zhang, Xianwei Wu +8

LLM-based code review agents promise scalable, always-on review, yet current systems suffer from two intertwined weaknesses: (1) non-determinism--unbounded tool use makes review ou…

cs.SE2026

Improving LLM-Based Go Code Review through Issue-List Generation and Context Augmentation

Kexin Sun, Yucong Guan, Jiaqi Sun +6

LLMs have shown strong potential for automating code review, yet their practical utility depends heavily on the design of generation and context strategies. In this paper, we inves…

cs.SE2026

Does AI Code Review Lead to Code Changes? A Case Study of GitHub Actions

Kexin Sun, Hongyu Kuang, Sebastian Baltes +6

AI-based code review tools automatically review and comment on pull requests to improve code quality. Despite their growing presence, little is known about their actual impact. We…

cs.SE2026

AACR-Bench: Evaluating Automatic Code Review with Holistic Repository-Level Context

Lei Zhang, Yongda Yu, Minghui Yu +11

High-quality evaluation benchmarks are pivotal for deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) in Automated Code Review (ACR). However, existing benchmarks suffer from two critical limi…

cs.SE2025

Fine-Tuning LLMs to Analyze Multiple Dimensions of Code Review: A Maximum Entropy Regulated Long Chain-of-Thought Approach

Yongda Yu, Guohao Shi, Xianwei Wu +8

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential in supporting automated code review due to their impressive capabilities in context understanding and reasoning. However, th…

cs.SE2025

Brevity is the Soul of Wit: Condensing Code Changes to Improve Commit Message Generation

Hongyu Kuang, Ning Zhang, Hui Gao +6

Commit messages are valuable resources for describing why code changes are committed to repositories in version control systems (e.g., Git). They effectively help developers unders…