217 citations · 350 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers
Consistency and validity of interdisciplinarity measures
Qi Wang, Jesper Wiborg Schneider
Measuring interdisciplinarity is a pertinent but challenging issue in quantitative studies of science. There seems to be a consensus in the literature that the concept of interdisc…
Exploration of Reproducibility Issues in Scientometric Research Part 2: Conceptual Reproducibility
Theresa Velden, Sybille Hinze, Andrea Scharnhorst +2
This is the second part of a small-scale explorative study in an effort to assess reproducibility issues specific to scientometrics research. This effort is motivated by the desire…
Exploration of reproducibility issues in scientometric research Part 1: Direct reproducibility
Ludo Waltman, Sybille Hinze, Andrea Scharnhorst +2
This is the first part of a small-scale explorative study in an effort to start assessing reproducibility issues specific to scientometrics research. This effort is motivated by th…
Identifying potential breakthrough publications using refined citation analyses: Three related explorative approaches
Jesper W. Schneider, Rodrigo Costas
The article presents three advanced citation-based methods used to detect potential breakthrough papers among very highly cited papers. We approach the detection of such papers fro…
A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators
Lorna Wildgaard, Jesper W. Schneider, Birger Larsen
An increasing demand for bibliometric assessment of individuals has led to a growth of new bibliometric indicators as well as new variants or combinations of established ones. The…
Caveats for using statistical significance tests in research assessments
Jesper W. Schneider
This paper raises concerns about the advantages of using statistical significance tests in research assessments as has recently been suggested in the debate about proper normalizat…