114 citations · 326 across the 19 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
Measuring what Matters: Construct Validity in Large Language Model Benchmarks
Andrew M. Bean, Ryan Othniel Kearns, Angelika Romanou +39
Evaluating large language models (LLMs) is crucial for both assessing their capabilities and identifying safety or robustness issues prior to deployment. Reliably measuring abstrac…
Establishing Best Practices for Building Rigorous Agentic Benchmarks
Yuxuan Zhu, Tengjun Jin, Yada Pruksachatkun +22
Benchmarks are essential for quantitatively tracking progress in AI. As AI agents become increasingly capable, researchers and practitioners have introduced agentic benchmarks to e…
Lessons from a Chimp: AI "Scheming" and the Quest for Ape Language
Christopher Summerfield, Lennart Luettgau, Magda Dubois +9
We examine recent research that asks whether current AI systems may be developing a capacity for "scheming" (covertly and strategically pursuing misaligned goals). We compare curre…
Skewed Score: A statistical framework to assess autograders
Magda Dubois, Harry Coppock, Mario Giulianelli +3
The evaluation of large language model (LLM) outputs is increasingly performed by other LLMs, a setup commonly known as "LLM-as-a-judge", or autograders. While autograders offer a…
HiBayES: A Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling Framework for AI Evaluation Statistics
Lennart Luettgau, Harry Coppock, Magda Dubois +2
As Large Language Models (LLMs) and other AI systems evolve, robustly estimating their capabilities from inherently stochastic outputs while systematically quantifying uncertainty…