182 citations · 202 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers · 1 filter
CountARFactuals -- Generating plausible model-agnostic counterfactual explanations with adversarial random forests
Susanne Dandl, Kristin Blesch, Timo Freiesleben +4
Counterfactual explanations elucidate algorithmic decisions by pointing to scenarios that would have led to an alternative, desired outcome. Giving insight into the model's behavio…
Leveraging Model-based Trees as Interpretable Surrogate Models for Model Distillation
Julia Herbinger, Susanne Dandl, Fiona K. Ewald +2
Surrogate models play a crucial role in retrospectively interpreting complex and powerful black box machine learning models via model distillation. This paper focuses on using mode…
Interpretable Regional Descriptors: Hyperbox-Based Local Explanations
Susanne Dandl, Giuseppe Casalicchio, Bernd Bischl +1
This work introduces interpretable regional descriptors, or IRDs, for local, model-agnostic interpretations. IRDs are hyperboxes that describe how an observation's feature values c…
counterfactuals: An R Package for Counterfactual Explanation Methods
Susanne Dandl, Andreas Hofheinz, Martin Binder +2
Counterfactual explanation methods provide information on how feature values of individual observations must be changed to obtain a desired prediction. Despite the increasing amoun…
General Pitfalls of Model-Agnostic Interpretation Methods for Machine Learning Models
Christoph Molnar, Gunnar König, Julia Herbinger +6
An increasing number of model-agnostic interpretation techniques for machine learning (ML) models such as partial dependence plots (PDP), permutation feature importance (PFI) and S…
Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanations
Susanne Dandl, Christoph Molnar, Martin Binder +1
Counterfactual explanations are one of the most popular methods to make predictions of black box machine learning models interpretable by providing explanations in the form of `wha…