1 citations · 1 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
Tenability and Weak Semantics: Modeling Non-uniform Defense -- Extended Version
Uri Andrews, Luca San Mauro, John Spoerl
In Dung-style abstract argumentation, various semantics capture notions of acceptability of arguments. The admissibility semantics capture the notion that an argument can be consis…
On the Complexity of the Grounded Semantics for Infinite Argumentation Frameworks
Uri Andrews, Luca San Mauro
Argumentation frameworks, consisting of arguments and an attack relation representing conflicts, are fundamental for formally studying reasoning under conflicting information. We u…
Complexity in finitary argumentation (extended version)
Uri Andrews, Luca San Mauro
Abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs) provide a formal setting to analyze many forms of reasoning with conflicting information. While the expressiveness of general infinite AFs m…
SCC-recursiveness in infinite argumentation (extended version)
Uri Andrews, Luca San Mauro
Argumentation frameworks (AFs) are a foundational tool in artificial intelligence for modeling structured reasoning and conflict. SCC-recursiveness is a well-known design principle…
Comparing Dialectical Systems: Contradiction and Counterexample in Belief Change (Extended Version)
Uri Andrews, Luca San Mauro
Dialectical systems are a mathematical formalism for modeling an agent updating a knowledge base seeking consistency. Introduced in the 1970s by Roberto Magari, they were originall…