27 citations · 78 across the 7 of their papers we have counts for
7 papers
Improving Interpersonal Communication by Simulating Audiences with Language Models
Ryan Liu, Howard Yen, Raja Marjieh +2
How do we communicate with others to achieve our goals? We use our prior experience or advice from others, or construct a candidate utterance by predicting how it will be received.…
Testing for Reviewer Anchoring in Peer Review: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ryan Liu, Steven Jecmen, Vincent Conitzer +2
Peer review frequently follows a process where reviewers first provide initial reviews, authors respond to these reviews, then reviewers update their reviews based on the authors'…
LLMs as Workers in Human-Computational Algorithms? Replicating Crowdsourcing Pipelines with LLMs
Tongshuang Wu, Haiyi Zhu, Maya Albayrak +21
LLMs have shown promise in replicating human-like behavior in crowdsourcing tasks that were previously thought to be exclusive to human abilities. However, current efforts focus ma…
ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing
Ryan Liu, Nihar B. Shah
Given the rapid ascent of large language models (LLMs), we study the question: (How) can large language models help in reviewing of scientific papers or proposals? We first conduct…
Cite-seeing and Reviewing: A Study on Citation Bias in Peer Review
Ivan Stelmakh, Charvi Rastogi, Ryan Liu +3
Citations play an important role in researchers' careers as a key factor in evaluation of scientific impact. Many anecdotes advice authors to exploit this fact and cite prospective…
Near-Optimal Reviewer Splitting in Two-Phase Paper Reviewing and Conference Experiment Design
Steven Jecmen, Hanrui Zhang, Ryan Liu +3
Many scientific conferences employ a two-phase paper review process, where some papers are assigned additional reviewers after the initial reviews are submitted. Many conferences a…
Mitigating Manipulation in Peer Review via Randomized Reviewer Assignments
Steven Jecmen, Hanrui Zhang, Ryan Liu +3
We consider three important challenges in conference peer review: (i) reviewers maliciously attempting to get assigned to certain papers to provide positive reviews, possibly as pa…