activity
20202025
most citedScim: Intelligent Skimming Support for Scientific Papers

37 citations · 73 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

10 papers

cs.IR2025★ 1 cited

Literature-Grounded Novelty Assessment of Scientific Ideas

Simra Shahid, Marissa Radensky, Raymond Fok +3

Automated scientific idea generation systems have made remarkable progress, yet the automatic evaluation of idea novelty remains a critical and underexplored challenge. Manual eval…

cs.HC2025

Facets, Taxonomies, and Syntheses: Navigating Structured Representations in LLM-Assisted Literature Review

Raymond Fok, Joseph Chee Chang, Marissa Radensky +4

Comprehensive literature review requires synthesizing vast amounts of research -- a labor intensive and cognitively demanding process. Most prior work focuses either on helping res…

cs.CL2024

ArxivDIGESTables: Synthesizing Scientific Literature into Tables using Language Models

Benjamin Newman, Yoonjoo Lee, Aakanksha Naik +6

When conducting literature reviews, scientists often create literature review tables - tables whose rows are publications and whose columns constitute a schema, a set of aspects us…

cs.HC2024★ 6 cited

Human-LLM Compound System for Scientific Ideation through Facet Recombination and Novelty Evaluation

Marissa Radensky, Simra Shahid, Raymond Fok +3

The scientific ideation process often involves blending facets of existing papers to create new ideas. We contribute Scideator, the first human-LLM system for facet-based scientifi…

cs.CL2023

A Question Answering Framework for Decontextualizing User-facing Snippets from Scientific Documents

Benjamin Newman, Luca Soldaini, Raymond Fok +2

Many real-world applications (e.g., note taking, search) require extracting a sentence or paragraph from a document and showing that snippet to a human outside of the source docume…

cs.AI2023★ 12 cited

In Search of Verifiability: Explanations Rarely Enable Complementary Performance in AI-Advised Decision Making

Raymond Fok, Daniel S. Weld

The current literature on AI-advised decision making -- involving explainable AI systems advising human decision makers -- presents a series of inconclusive and confounding results…

cs.HC2023★ 8 cited

The Semantic Reader Project: Augmenting Scholarly Documents through AI-Powered Interactive Reading Interfaces

Kyle Lo, Joseph Chee Chang, Andrew Head +52

Scholarly publications are key to the transfer of knowledge from scholars to others. However, research papers are information-dense, and as the volume of the scientific literature…

cs.HC2022★ 37 cited

Scim: Intelligent Skimming Support for Scientific Papers

Raymond Fok, Hita Kambhamettu, Luca Soldaini +5

Researchers need to keep up with immense literatures, though it is time-consuming and difficult to do so. In this paper, we investigate the role that intelligent interfaces can pla…

cs.HC2020★ 1 cited

Augmenting Scientific Papers with Just-in-Time, Position-Sensitive Definitions of Terms and Symbols

Andrew Head, Kyle Lo, Dongyeop Kang +4

Despite the central importance of research papers to scientific progress, they can be difficult to read. Comprehension is often stymied when the information needed to understand a…

cs.AI2020★ 8 cited

Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance

Gagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou +5

Many researchers motivate explainable AI with studies showing that human-AI team performance on decision-making tasks improves when the AI explains its recommendations. However, pr…