4 citations · 9 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
Risk-Limiting Audits for Condorcet Elections
Michelle Blom, Peter J. Stuckey, Vanessa Teague +1
Elections where electors rank the candidates (or a subset of the candidates) in order of preference allow the collection of more information about the electors' intent. The most wi…
A First Approach to Risk-Limiting Audits for Single Transferable Vote Elections
Michelle Blom, Peter J. Stuckey, Vanessa Teague +1
Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) are an increasingly important method for checking that the reported outcome of an election is, in fact, correct. Indeed, their use is increasingly being…
Assertion-Based Approaches to Auditing Complex Elections, with Application to Party-List Proportional Elections
Michelle Blom, Jurlind Budurushi, Ronald L. Rivest +4
Risk-limiting audits (RLAs), an ingredient in evidence-based elections, are increasingly common. They are a rigorous statistical means of ensuring that electoral results are correc…
Auditing Hamiltonian Elections
Michelle Blom, Philip B. Stark, Peter J. Stuckey +2
Presidential primaries are a critical part of the United States Presidential electoral process, since they are used to select the candidates in the Presidential election. While met…
Random errors are not necessarily politically neutral
Michelle Blom, Andrew Conway, Peter J. Stuckey +2
Errors are inevitable in the implementation of any complex process. Here we examine the effect of random errors on Single Transferable Vote (STV) elections, a common approach to de…