activity
20202025
most citedVerifiable blind quantum computing with trapped ions and single photons

49 citations · 163 across the 14 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing quant-phShow all

17 papers · 1 filter

quant-ph2025

Plugging Leaks in Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation and Verification

Theodoros Kapourniotis, Dominik Leichtle, Luka Music +1

With the advent of quantum cloud computing, the security of delegated quantum computation has become of utmost importance. While multiple statistically secure blind verification sc…

quant-ph2025

Logical accreditation: a framework for efficient certification of fault-tolerant computations

James Mills, Adithya Sireesh, Dominik Leichtle +2

As fault-tolerant quantum computers scale, certifying the accuracy of computations performed with encoded logical qubits will soon become classically intractable. This creates a cr…

quant-ph2025

Selectively Blind Quantum Computation

Abbas Poshtvan, Oleksandra Lapiha, Mina Doosti +3

Known protocols for secure delegation of quantum computations from a client to a server in an information theoretic setting require quantum communication. In this work, we investig…

quant-ph2025

Composably Secure Delegated Quantum Computation with Weak Coherent Pulses

Maxime Garnier, Dominik Leichtle, Luka Music +1

A client can delegate a quantum computation to a powerful remote server while ensuring the privacy and the integrity of its computation via Secure Delegated Quantum Computation (SD…

quant-ph2024

On-Chip Verified Quantum Computation with an Ion-Trap Quantum Processing Unit

Cica Gustiani, Dominik Leichtle, Daniel Mills +3

We present and experimentally demonstrate a novel approach to verification and benchmarking of quantum computing, implementing it on an ion-trap quantum computer. Unlike previous i…

quant-ph2024★ 2 cited

Design and demonstration of an operating system for executing applications on quantum network nodes

Carlo Delle Donne, Mariagrazia Iuliano, Bart van der Vecht +22

The goal of future quantum networks is to enable new internet applications that are impossible to achieve using solely classical communication. Up to now, demonstrations of quantum…

quant-ph2024★ 12 cited

Experimental verifiable multi-client blind quantum computing on a Qline architecture

Beatrice Polacchi, Dominik Leichtle, Gonzalo Carvacho +5

The exploitation of certification tools by end users represents a fundamental aspect of the development of quantum technologies as the hardware scales up beyond the regime of class…

quant-ph2024

Heuristic-free Verification-inspired Quantum Benchmarking

Johannes Frank, Elham Kashefi, Dominik Leichtle +1

In this paper, we introduce a new approach to quantum benchmarking inspired by quantum verification motivating new paradigms of quantum benchmarking. Our proposed benchmark not onl…

quant-ph2024★ 1 cited

Quantum Error Suppression with Subgroup Stabilisation

Bo Yang, Elham Kashefi, Dominik Leichtle +1

Quantum state purification is the functionality that, given multiple copies of an unknown state, outputs a state with increased purity. This will be an essential building block for…

quant-ph2024

Verification of Quantum Computations without Trusted Preparations or Measurements

Elham Kashefi, Dominik Leichtle, Luka Music +1

With the advent of delegated quantum computing as a service, verifying quantum computations is becoming a question of great importance. Existing information theoretically Secure De…

quant-ph2023★ 31 cited

Multi-client distributed blind quantum computation with the Qline architecture

Beatrice Polacchi, Dominik Leichtle, Leonardo Limongi +6

Universal blind quantum computing allows users with minimal quantum resources to delegate a quantum computation to a remote quantum server, while keeping intrinsically hidden input…

quant-ph2023★ 49 cited

Verifiable blind quantum computing with trapped ions and single photons

P. Drmota, D. P. Nadlinger, D. Main +9

We report the first hybrid matter-photon implementation of verifiable blind quantum computing. We use a trapped-ion quantum server and a client-side photonic detection system netwo…

quant-ph2023★ 2 cited

Asymmetric Quantum Secure Multi-Party Computation With Weak Clients Against Dishonest Majority

Theodoros Kapourniotis, Elham Kashefi, Dominik Leichtle +2

Secure multi-party computation (SMPC) protocols allow several parties that distrust each other to collectively compute a function on their inputs. In this paper, we introduce a pro…

quant-ph2022★ 12 cited

Unifying Quantum Verification and Error-Detection: Theory and Tools for Optimisations

Theodoros Kapourniotis, Elham Kashefi, Dominik Leichtle +2

With the advent of cloud-based quantum computing, it has become vital to provide strong guarantees that computations delegated by clients to quantum service providers have been exe…

quant-ph2021

Verifying BQP Computations on Noisy Devices with Minimal Overhead

Dominik Leichtle, Luka Music, Elham Kashefi +1

With the development of delegated quantum computation, clients will want to ensure confidentiality of their data and algorithms, and the integrity of their computations. While prot…

quant-ph2020★ 41 cited

Securing Quantum Computations in the NISQ Era

Elham Kashefi, Dominik Leichtle, Luka Music +1

Recent experimental achievements motivate an ever-growing interest from companies starting to feel the limitations of classical computing. Yet, in light of ongoing privacy scandals…

quant-ph2020★ 13 cited

Security Limitations of Classical-Client Delegated Quantum Computing

Christian Badertscher, Alexandru Cojocaru, Léo Colisson +4

Secure delegated quantum computing allows a computationally weak client to outsource an arbitrary quantum computation to an untrusted quantum server in a privacy-preserving manner.…