activity
20202025
most citedFaith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality

71 citations · 144 across the 14 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

10 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2025

The Surprising Effectiveness of Membership Inference with Simple N-Gram Coverage

Skyler Hallinan, Jaehun Jung, Melanie Sclar +7

Membership inference attacks serves as useful tool for fair use of language models, such as detecting potential copyright infringement and auditing data leakage. However, many curr…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Finding Flawed Fictions: Evaluating Complex Reasoning in Language Models via Plot Hole Detection

Kabir Ahuja, Melanie Sclar, Yulia Tsvetkov

Stories are a fundamental aspect of human experience. Engaging deeply with stories and spotting plot holes -- inconsistencies in a storyline that break the internal logic or rules…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

AI as Humanity's Salieri: Quantifying Linguistic Creativity of Language Models via Systematic Attribution of Machine Text against Web Text

Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar, Skyler Hallinan +8

Creativity has long been considered one of the most difficult aspect of human intelligence for AI to mimic. However, the rise of Large Language Models (LLMs), like ChatGPT, has rai…

cs.CL2023★ 10 cited

The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learning

Bill Yuchen Lin, Abhilasha Ravichander, Ximing Lu +5

The alignment tuning process of large language models (LLMs) typically involves instruction learning through supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and preference tuning via reinforcement le…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind in Interactions

Hyunwoo Kim, Melanie Sclar, Xuhui Zhou +4

Theory of mind (ToM) evaluations currently focus on testing models using passive narratives that inherently lack interactivity. We introduce FANToM, a new benchmark designed to str…

cs.CL2023★ 51 cited

Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formatting

Melanie Sclar, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov +1

As large language models (LLMs) are adopted as a fundamental component of language technologies, it is crucial to accurately characterize their performance. Because choices in prom…

cs.CL2023★ 4 cited

Phenomenal Yet Puzzling: Testing Inductive Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Hypothesis Refinement

Linlu Qiu, Liwei Jiang, Ximing Lu +8

The ability to derive underlying principles from a handful of observations and then generalize to novel situations -- known as inductive reasoning -- is central to human intelligen…

cs.CL2023

Minding Language Models' (Lack of) Theory of Mind: A Plug-and-Play Multi-Character Belief Tracker

Melanie Sclar, Sachin Kumar, Peter West +3

Theory of Mind (ToM)$\unicode{x2014}$the ability to reason about the mental states of other people$\unicode{x2014}$is a key element of our social intelligence. Yet, despite their e…

cs.CL2023★ 71 cited

Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality

Nouha Dziri, Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar +13

Transformer large language models (LLMs) have sparked admiration for their exceptional performance on tasks that demand intricate multi-step reasoning. Yet, these models simultaneo…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

Referee: Reference-Free Sentence Summarization with Sharper Controllability through Symbolic Knowledge Distillation

Melanie Sclar, Peter West, Sachin Kumar +2

We present Referee, a novel framework for sentence summarization that can be trained reference-free (i.e., requiring no gold summaries for supervision), while allowing direct contr…