activity
20062026
most citedLimit distribution theory for maximum likelihood estimation of a log-concave density

87 citations · 557 across the 33 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing stat.APShow all

11 papers · 1 filter

stat.AP2024

Clinical trials with interim analyses: Standardizing Terminology to increase clarity

Elina Asikanius, Benjamin Hofner, Lisa V. Hampson +5

Interim analyses for group-sequential decision making are prevalent in clinical trials. Methodology is well established and has been routinely implemented over the last decades. St…

stat.AP2024

Survival analysis for AdVerse events with VarYing follow-up times (SAVVY): summary of findings and a roadmap for the future of safety analyses in clinical trials

Kaspar Rufibach, Jan Beyersmann, Tim Friede +2

The SAVVY project aims to improve the analyses of adverse events (AEs) in clinical trials through the use of survival techniques appropriately dealing with varying follow-up times…

stat.AP2023★ 2 cited

Oncology clinical trial design planning based on a multistate model that jointly models progression-free and overall survival endpoints

Alexandra Erdmann, Jan Beyersmann, Kaspar Rufibach

When planning an oncology clinical trial, the usual approach is to assume proportional hazards and even an exponential distribution for time-to-event endpoints. Often, besides the…

stat.AP2020

Conditional Power and Friends: The Why and How of (Un)planned, Unblinded Sample Size Recalculations in Confirmatory Trials

Kevin Kunzmann, Michael J. Grayling, Kim M. Lee +3

Adapting the final sample size of a trial to the evidence accruing during the trial is a natural way to address planning uncertainty. Designs with adaptive sample size need to acco…

stat.AP2020★ 28 cited

Survival analysis for AdVerse events with VarYing follow-up times (SAVVY) -- estimation of adverse event risks

Regina Stegherr, Claudia Schmoor, Jan Beyersmann +12

The SAVVY project aims to improve the analyses of adverse event (AE) data in clinical trials through the use of survival techniques appropriately dealing with varying follow-up tim…

stat.AP2020★ 4 cited

Survival analysis for AdVerse events with VarYing follow-up times (SAVVY) -- comparison of adverse event risks in randomized controlled trials

Kaspar Rufibach, Regina Stegherr, Claudia Schmoor +12

Analyses of adverse events (AEs) are an important aspect of the evaluation of experimental therapies. The SAVVY (Survival analysis for AdVerse events with Varying follow-up times)…

stat.AP2020★ 68 cited

Principal Stratum Strategy: Potential Role in Drug Development

Björn Bornkamp, Kaspar Rufibach, Jianchang Lin +6

A randomized trial allows estimation of the causal effect of an intervention compared to a control in the overall population and in subpopulations defined by baseline characteristi…

stat.AP2020★ 13 cited

A review of Bayesian perspectives on sample size derivation for confirmatory trials

Kevin Kunzmann, Michael J. Grayling, Kim May Lee +3

Sample size derivation is a crucial element of the planning phase of any confirmatory trial. A sample size is typically derived based on constraints on the maximal acceptable type…

stat.AP2019★ 31 cited

Survival analysis for AdVerse events with VarYing follow-up times (SAVVY): Rationale and statistical concept of a meta-analytic study

Regina Stegherr, Jan Beyersmann, Valentine Jehl +4

The assessment of safety is an important aspect of the evaluation of new therapies in clinical trials, with analyses of adverse events being an essential part of this. Standard met…

stat.AP2019★ 3 cited

Integrating Phase 2 into Phase 3 based on an Intermediate Endpoint While Accounting for a Cure Proportion -- with an Application to the Design of a Clinical Trial in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Kaspar Rufibach, Dominik Heinzmann, Annabelle Monnet

For a trial with primary endpoint overall survival for a molecule with curative potential, statistical methods that rely on the proportional hazards assumption may underestimate th…

stat.AP2018★ 29 cited

A multistate model for early decision making in oncology

Ulrich Beyer, David Dejardin, Matthias Meller +2

The development of oncology drugs progresses through multiple phases, where after each phase a decision is made about whether to move a molecule forward. Early phase efficacy decis…