activity
20162023
most citedEquipping sequent-based argumentation with defeasible assumptions

2 citations · 4 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

6 papers

cs.AI2023★ 1 cited

Human-centred explanation of rule-based decision-making systems in the legal domain

Suzan Zuurmond, AnneMarie Borg, Matthijs van Kempen +1

We propose a human-centred explanation method for rule-based automated decision-making systems in the legal domain. Firstly, we establish a conceptual framework for developing expl…

cs.AI2021

Contrastive Explanations for Argumentation-Based Conclusions

AnneMarie Borg, Floris Bex

In this paper we discuss contrastive explanations for formal argumentation - the question why a certain argument (the fact) can be accepted, whilst another argument (the foil) cann…

cs.AI2020

Necessary and Sufficient Explanations in Abstract Argumentation

AnneMarie Borg, Floris Bex

In this paper, we discuss necessary and sufficient explanations for formal argumentation - the question whether and why a certain argument can be accepted (or not) under various ex…

cs.AI2018★ 1 cited

Relevance in Structured Argumentation

AnneMarie Borg, Christian Straßer

We study properties related to relevance in non-monotonic consequence relations obtained by systems of structured argumentation. Relevance desiderata concern the robustness of a co…

cs.LO2018★ 2 cited

Equipping sequent-based argumentation with defeasible assumptions

AnneMarie Borg

In many expert and everyday reasoning contexts it is very useful to reason on the basis of defeasible assumptions. For instance, if the information at hand is incomplete we often u…

cs.SI2016

An argumentative agent-based model of scientific inquiry

Annemarie Borg, Daniel Frey, Dunja Šešelja +1

In this paper we present an agent-based model (ABM) of scientific inquiry aimed at investigating how different social networks impact the efficiency of scientists in acquiring know…