2 citations · 4 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers
Human-centred explanation of rule-based decision-making systems in the legal domain
Suzan Zuurmond, AnneMarie Borg, Matthijs van Kempen +1
We propose a human-centred explanation method for rule-based automated decision-making systems in the legal domain. Firstly, we establish a conceptual framework for developing expl…
Contrastive Explanations for Argumentation-Based Conclusions
AnneMarie Borg, Floris Bex
In this paper we discuss contrastive explanations for formal argumentation - the question why a certain argument (the fact) can be accepted, whilst another argument (the foil) cann…
Necessary and Sufficient Explanations in Abstract Argumentation
AnneMarie Borg, Floris Bex
In this paper, we discuss necessary and sufficient explanations for formal argumentation - the question whether and why a certain argument can be accepted (or not) under various ex…
Relevance in Structured Argumentation
AnneMarie Borg, Christian Straßer
We study properties related to relevance in non-monotonic consequence relations obtained by systems of structured argumentation. Relevance desiderata concern the robustness of a co…
Equipping sequent-based argumentation with defeasible assumptions
AnneMarie Borg
In many expert and everyday reasoning contexts it is very useful to reason on the basis of defeasible assumptions. For instance, if the information at hand is incomplete we often u…
An argumentative agent-based model of scientific inquiry
Annemarie Borg, Daniel Frey, Dunja Šešelja +1
In this paper we present an agent-based model (ABM) of scientific inquiry aimed at investigating how different social networks impact the efficiency of scientists in acquiring know…