activity
20212025
most citedOnline Engagement with Retracted Articles: Who, When, and How?

5 citations · 7 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

6 papers

cs.HC2025

The Persistence of Retracted Papers on Wikipedia

Haohan Shi, Yulin Yu, Daniel M. Romero +1

Wikipedia serves as a key infrastructure for public access to scientific knowledge, but it faces challenges in maintaining the credibility of cited sources--especially when scienti…

cs.LG2025

Low-dimensional embeddings of high-dimensional data

Cyril de Bodt, Alex Diaz-Papkovich, Michael Bleher +18

Large collections of high-dimensional data have become nearly ubiquitous across many academic fields and application domains, ranging from biology to the humanities. Since working…

cs.SI2023

Emergent Influence Networks in Good-Faith Online Discussions

Henry K. Dambanemuya, Daniel Romero, Emőke-Ágnes Horvát

Town hall-type debates are increasingly moving online, irrevocably transforming public discourse. Yet, we know relatively little about crucial social dynamics that determine which…

cs.SI2023

Understanding (Ir)rational Herding Online

Henry K. Dambanemuya, Johannes Wachs, Emőke-Ágnes Horvát

Investigations of social influence in collective decision-making have become possible due to recent technologies and platforms that record interactions in far larger groups than co…

cs.SI2022★ 5 cited

Online Engagement with Retracted Articles: Who, When, and How?

Henry K. Dambanemuya, Rod Abhari, Nicholas Vincent +1

Retracted research discussed on social media can spread misinformation. Yet we lack an understanding of how retracted articles are mentioned by academic and non-academic users. Thi…

cs.SI2021★ 2 cited

Publishing patterns reflect political polarization in news media

Nick Hagar, Johannes Wachs, Emőke-Ágnes Horvát

Digital news outlets rely on a variety of outside contributors, from freelance journalists, to political commentators, to executives and politicians. These external dependencies cr…