activity
20152026
most citedHow Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Models

13 citations · 35 across the 23 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

28 papers

cs.CL2026

Not-So-Strange Love: Language Models and Generative Linguistic Theories are More Compatible than They Appear

R. Thomas McCoy

Futrell and Mahowald (2025) frame the success of neural language models (LMs) as supporting gradient, usage-based linguistic theories. I argue that LMs can also instantiate theorie…

cs.CL2026

You Can't Fight in Here! This is BBS!

Richard Futrell, Kyle Mahowald

Norm, the formal theoretical linguist, and Claudette, the computational language scientist, have a lovely time discussing whether modern language models can inform important questi…

cs.CL2026

Across the Levels of Analysis: Explaining Predictive Processing in Humans Requires More Than Machine-Estimated Probabilities

Sathvik Nair, Colin Phillips

Under the lens of Marr's levels of analysis, we critique and extend two claims about language models (LMs) and language processing: first, that predicting upcoming linguistic infor…

cs.CL2026

Are Language Models Models?

Philip Resnik

Futrell and Mahowald claim LMs "serve as model systems", but an assessment at each of Marr's three levels suggests the claim is clearly not true at the implementation level, poorly…

cs.CL2025

Linguists should learn to love speech-based deep learning models

Marianne de Heer Kloots, Paul Boersma, Willem Zuidema

Futrell and Mahowald present a useful framework bridging technology-oriented deep learning systems and explanation-oriented linguistic theories. Unfortunately, the target article's…

cs.CL2025

Large language models are not about natural language

Johan J. Bolhuis, Andrea Moro, Stephen Crain +1

Large Language Models are useless for linguistics, as they are probabilistic models that require a vast amount of data to analyse externalized strings of words. In contrast, human…

cs.CL2025

Language models as tools for investigating the distinction between possible and impossible natural languages

Julie Kallini, Christopher Potts

We argue that language models (LMs) have strong potential as investigative tools for probing the distinction between possible and impossible natural languages and thus uncovering t…

cs.CL2025★ 13 cited

How Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Models

Richard Futrell, Kyle Mahowald

Language models can produce fluent, grammatical text. Nonetheless, some maintain that language models don't really learn language and also that, even if they did, that would not be…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Mission: Impossible Language Models

Julie Kallini, Isabel Papadimitriou, Richard Futrell +2

Chomsky and others have very directly claimed that large language models (LLMs) are equally capable of learning languages that are possible and impossible for humans to learn. Howe…

cs.CL2023

Revisiting the Optimality of Word Lengths

Tiago Pimentel, Clara Meister, Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox +2

Zipf (1935) posited that wordforms are optimized to minimize utterances' communicative costs. Under the assumption that cost is given by an utterance's length, he supported this cl…

cs.CL2023

Counterfactual Probing for the Influence of Affect and Specificity on Intergroup Bias

Venkata S Govindarajan, Kyle Mahowald, David I. Beaver +1

While existing work on studying bias in NLP focues on negative or pejorative language use, Govindarajan et al. (2023) offer a revised framing of bias in terms of intergroup social…

cs.CL2023

A Method for Studying Semantic Construal in Grammatical Constructions with Interpretable Contextual Embedding Spaces

Gabriella Chronis, Kyle Mahowald, Katrin Erk

We study semantic construal in grammatical constructions using large language models. First, we project contextual word embeddings into three interpretable semantic spaces, each de…

cs.CL2023★ 2 cited

Analogy in Contact: Modeling Maltese Plural Inflection

Sara Court, Andrea D. Sims, Micha Elsner

Maltese is often described as having a hybrid morphological system resulting from extensive contact between Semitic and Romance language varieties. Such a designation reflects an e…

cs.CL2023

Elaborative Simplification as Implicit Questions Under Discussion

Yating Wu, William Sheffield, Kyle Mahowald +1

Automated text simplification, a technique useful for making text more accessible to people such as children and emergent bilinguals, is often thought of as a monolingual translati…

cs.CL2023★ 2 cited

A Discerning Several Thousand Judgments: GPT-3 Rates the Article + Adjective + Numeral + Noun Construction

Kyle Mahowald

Knowledge of syntax includes knowledge of rare, idiosyncratic constructions. LLMs must overcome frequency biases in order to master such constructions. In this study, I prompt GPT-…

cs.CL2023

For Generated Text, Is NLI-Neutral Text the Best Text?

Michail Mersinias, Kyle Mahowald

We explore incorporating natural language inference (NLI) into the text generative pipeline by using a pre-trained NLI model to assess whether a generated sentence entails, contrad…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

Why is Winoground Hard? Investigating Failures in Visuolinguistic Compositionality

Anuj Diwan, Layne Berry, Eunsol Choi +2

Recent visuolinguistic pre-trained models show promising progress on various end tasks such as image retrieval and video captioning. Yet, they fail miserably on the recently propos…

cs.CL2022

Inducing Character-level Structure in Subword-based Language Models with Type-level Interchange Intervention Training

Jing Huang, Zhengxuan Wu, Kyle Mahowald +1

Language tasks involving character-level manipulations (e.g., spelling corrections, arithmetic operations, word games) are challenging for models operating on subword units. To add…

cs.CL2022

longhorns at DADC 2022: How many linguists does it take to fool a Question Answering model? A systematic approach to adversarial attacks

Venelin Kovatchev, Trina Chatterjee, Venkata S Govindarajan +9

Developing methods to adversarially challenge NLP systems is a promising avenue for improving both model performance and interpretability. Here, we describe the approach of the tea…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

What do tokens know about their characters and how do they know it?

Ayush Kaushal, Kyle Mahowald

Pre-trained language models (PLMs) that use subword tokenization schemes can succeed at a variety of language tasks that require character-level information, despite lacking explic…

cs.CL2022★ 4 cited

When classifying grammatical role, BERT doesn't care about word order... except when it matters

Isabel Papadimitriou, Richard Futrell, Kyle Mahowald

Because meaning can often be inferred from lexical semantics alone, word order is often a redundant cue in natural language. For example, the words chopped, chef, and onion are mor…

cs.CL2022★ 6 cited

Grammatical cues to subjecthood are redundant in a majority of simple clauses across languages

Kyle Mahowald, Evgeniia Diachek, Edward Gibson +2

Grammatical cues are sometimes redundant with word meanings in natural language. For instance, English word order rules constrain the word order of a sentence like "The dog chewed…

cs.CL2021

A Massively Multilingual Analysis of Cross-linguality in Shared Embedding Space

Alex Jones, William Yang Wang, Kyle Mahowald

In cross-lingual language models, representations for many different languages live in the same space. Here, we investigate the linguistic and non-linguistic factors affecting sent…

cs.CL2021

How (Non-)Optimal is the Lexicon?

Tiago Pimentel, Irene Nikkarinen, Kyle Mahowald +2

The mapping of lexical meanings to wordforms is a major feature of natural languages. While usage pressures might assign short words to frequent meanings (Zipf's law of abbreviatio…