activity
20212023
most citedHow to Find Strong Summary Coherence Measures? A Toolbox and a Comparative Study for Summary Coherence Measure Evaluation

4 citations · 7 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

Bias in News Summarization: Measures, Pitfalls and Corpora

Julius Steen, Katja Markert

Summarization is an important application of large language models (LLMs). Most previous evaluation of summarization models has focused on their content selection, faithfulness, gr…

cs.CL2023★ 2 cited

AMR4NLI: Interpretable and robust NLI measures from semantic graphs

Juri Opitz, Shira Wein, Julius Steen +2

The task of natural language inference (NLI) asks whether a given premise (expressed in NL) entails a given NL hypothesis. NLI benchmarks contain human ratings of entailment, but t…

cs.CL2023

With a Little Push, NLI Models can Robustly and Efficiently Predict Faithfulness

Julius Steen, Juri Opitz, Anette Frank +1

Conditional language models still generate unfaithful output that is not supported by their input. These unfaithful generations jeopardize trust in real-world applications such as…

cs.CL2022★ 4 cited

How to Find Strong Summary Coherence Measures? A Toolbox and a Comparative Study for Summary Coherence Measure Evaluation

Julius Steen, Katja Markert

Automatically evaluating the coherence of summaries is of great significance both to enable cost-efficient summarizer evaluation and as a tool for improving coherence by selecting…

cs.CL2021

How to Evaluate a Summarizer: Study Design and Statistical Analysis for Manual Linguistic Quality Evaluation

Julius Steen, Katja Markert

Manual evaluation is essential to judge progress on automatic text summarization. However, we conduct a survey on recent summarization system papers that reveals little agreement o…