most citedLess is More: Supporting Developers in Vulnerability Detection during Code Review

27 citations · 69 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.SEShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.SE2022★ 26 cited

Software Security during Modern Code Review: The Developer's Perspective

Larissa Braz, Alberto Bacchelli

To avoid software vulnerabilities, organizations are shifting security to earlier stages of the software development, such as at code review time. In this paper, we aim to understa…

cs.SE2022★ 16 cited

First Come First Served: The Impact of File Position on Code Review

Enrico Fregnan, Larissa Braz, Marco D'Ambros +2

The most popular code review tools (e.g., Gerrit and GitHub) present the files to review sorted in alphabetical order. Could this choice or, more generally, the relative position i…

cs.SE2022

An Exploratory Study on Regression Vulnerabilities

Larissa Braz, Enrico Fregnan, Vivek Arora +1

Background: Security regressions are vulnerabilities introduced in a previously unaffected software system. They often happen as a result of source code changes (e.g., a bug fix) a…

cs.SE2022★ 27 cited

Less is More: Supporting Developers in Vulnerability Detection during Code Review

Larissa Braz, Christian Aeberhard, Gül Çalikli +1

Reviewing source code from a security perspective has proven to be a difficult task. Indeed, previous research has shown that developers often miss even popular and easy-to-detect…

cs.SE2021

Why Don't Developers Detect Improper Input Validation?'; DROP TABLE Papers; --

Larissa Braz, Enrico Fregnan, Gül Çalikli +1

Improper Input Validation (IIV) is a software vulnerability that occurs when a system does not safely handle input data. Even though IIV is easy to detect and fix, it still commonl…