1 citations · 1 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
A Feedback Toolkit and Procedural Guidance for Teaching Thorough Testing
Steffen Dick, Christoph Bockisch, Harrie Passier +2
Correctness is one of the more important criteria of qualitative software. However, it is often taught in isolation and most students consider it only as an afterthought. They also…
Guided Object-Oriented Development
Harrie Passier, Lex Bijlsma, Ruurd Kuiper +1
To improve the quality of programs we provide an approach to guidance in the process of program development. At the higher level the various activities and their dependencies to st…
Diagnosing Refactoring Dangers
Wouter Brinksma, William Wernsen, Evert Verduin +4
This report investigates the relationship between software refactoring and behavior preservation. Existing behavior preservation analyses often lack comprehensive insights into ref…
Improving students' code correctness and test completeness by informal specifications
Arno Broeders, Ruud Hermans, Sylvia Stuurman +2
The quality of software produced by students is often poor. How to teach students to develop good quality software has long been a topic in computer science education and research.…
How do students test software units?
Lex Bijlsma, Niels Doorn, Harrie Passier +2
We gained insight into ideas and beliefs on testing of students who finished an introductory course on programming without any formal education on testing. We asked students to fil…