activity
20212025
most citedChatGPT: A Meta-Analysis after 2.5 Months

23 citations · 28 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

11 papers

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

DeepSeek-R1 vs. o3-mini: How Well can Reasoning LLMs Evaluate MT and Summarization?

Daniil Larionov, Sotaro Takeshita, Ran Zhang +5

Reasoning-enabled large language models (LLMs) excel in logical tasks, yet their utility for evaluating natural language generation remains unexplored. This study systematically co…

cs.CL2025

ContrastScore: Towards Higher Quality, Less Biased, More Efficient Evaluation Metrics with Contrastive Evaluation

Xiao Wang, Daniil Larionov, Siwei Wu +4

Evaluating the quality of generated text automatically remains a significant challenge. Conventional reference-based metrics have been shown to exhibit relatively weak correlation…

cs.CL2025

BatchGEMBA: Token-Efficient Machine Translation Evaluation with Batched Prompting and Prompt Compression

Daniil Larionov, Steffen Eger

Recent advancements in Large Language Model (LLM)-based Natural Language Generation evaluation have largely focused on single-example prompting, resulting in significant token over…

cs.CL2024

PromptOptMe: Error-Aware Prompt Compression for LLM-based MT Evaluation Metrics

Daniil Larionov, Steffen Eger

Evaluating the quality of machine-generated natural language content is a challenging task in Natural Language Processing (NLP). Recently, large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 h…

cs.DL2024

NLLG Quarterly arXiv Report 09/24: What are the most influential current AI Papers?

Christoph Leiter, Jonas Belouadi, Yanran Chen +4

The NLLG (Natural Language Learning & Generation) arXiv reports assist in navigating the rapidly evolving landscape of NLP and AI research across cs.CL, cs.CV, cs.AI, and cs.LG cat…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

xCOMET-lite: Bridging the Gap Between Efficiency and Quality in Learned MT Evaluation Metrics

Daniil Larionov, Mikhail Seleznyov, Vasiliy Viskov +2

State-of-the-art trainable machine translation evaluation metrics like xCOMET achieve high correlation with human judgment but rely on large encoders (up to 10.7B parameters), maki…

cs.DL2023

NLLG Quarterly arXiv Report 09/23: What are the most influential current AI Papers?

Ran Zhang, Aida Kostikova, Christoph Leiter +5

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has witnessed rapid growth, especially in the subfields Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML) and Computer Vision (CV). Keeping pace…

cs.CY2023★ 2 cited

NLLG Quarterly arXiv Report 06/23: What are the most influential current AI Papers?

Steffen Eger, Christoph Leiter, Jonas Belouadi +5

The rapid growth of information in the field of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly in the subfields of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning (ML…

cs.CL2023★ 23 cited

ChatGPT: A Meta-Analysis after 2.5 Months

Christoph Leiter, Ran Zhang, Yanran Chen +4

ChatGPT, a chatbot developed by OpenAI, has gained widespread popularity and media attention since its release in November 2022. However, little hard evidence is available regardin…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

Towards Computationally Feasible Deep Active Learning

Akim Tsvigun, Artem Shelmanov, Gleb Kuzmin +5

Active learning (AL) is a prominent technique for reducing the annotation effort required for training machine learning models. Deep learning offers a solution for several essentia…

cs.CL2021

Active Learning for Sequence Tagging with Deep Pre-trained Models and Bayesian Uncertainty Estimates

Artem Shelmanov, Dmitri Puzyrev, Lyubov Kupriyanova +7

Annotating training data for sequence tagging of texts is usually very time-consuming. Recent advances in transfer learning for natural language processing in conjunction with acti…