activity
20202026
most citedCausal machine learning for predicting treatment outcomes

322 citations · 432 across the 23 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2022Show all

5 papers · 1 filter

stat.ML2022

Adaptive Identification of Populations with Treatment Benefit in Clinical Trials: Machine Learning Challenges and Solutions

Alicia Curth, Alihan Hüyük, Mihaela van der Schaar

We study the problem of adaptively identifying patient subpopulations that benefit from a given treatment during a confirmatory clinical trial. This type of adaptive clinical trial…

cs.LG2022★ 6 cited

Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of Interpretability

Jonathan Crabbé, Alicia Curth, Ioana Bica +1

Estimating personalized effects of treatments is a complex, yet pervasive problem. To tackle it, recent developments in the machine learning (ML) literature on heterogeneous treatm…

stat.ML2022★ 24 cited

HyperImpute: Generalized Iterative Imputation with Automatic Model Selection

Daniel Jarrett, Bogdan Cebere, Tennison Liu +2

Consider the problem of imputing missing values in a dataset. One the one hand, conventional approaches using iterative imputation benefit from the simplicity and customizability o…

cs.LG2022

Inverse Online Learning: Understanding Non-Stationary and Reactionary Policies

Alex J. Chan, Alicia Curth, Mihaela van der Schaar

Human decision making is well known to be imperfect and the ability to analyse such processes individually is crucial when attempting to aid or improve a decision-maker's ability t…

stat.ML2022★ 4 cited

Combining Observational and Randomized Data for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Tobias Hatt, Jeroen Berrevoets, Alicia Curth +2

Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects is an important problem across many domains. In order to accurately estimate such treatment effects, one typically relies on data from ob…