activity
20212023
most citedA Systematic Study of Bias Amplification

31 citations · 59 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CVShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.CV2023★ 1 cited

FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation Benchmark

Laura Gustafson, Chloe Rolland, Nikhila Ravi +5

Computer vision models have known performance disparities across attributes such as gender and skin tone. This means during tasks such as classification and detection, model perfor…

cs.CV2023★ 1 cited

DIG In: Evaluating Disparities in Image Generations with Indicators for Geographic Diversity

Melissa Hall, Candace Ross, Adina Williams +3

The unprecedented photorealistic results achieved by recent text-to-image generative systems and their increasing use as plug-and-play content creation solutions make it crucial to…

cs.CV2023★ 2 cited

Pinpointing Why Object Recognition Performance Degrades Across Income Levels and Geographies

Laura Gustafson, Megan Richards, Melissa Hall +3

Despite impressive advances in object-recognition, deep learning systems' performance degrades significantly across geographies and lower income levels raising pressing concerns of…

cs.CV2023★ 2 cited

Towards Reliable Assessments of Demographic Disparities in Multi-Label Image Classifiers

Melissa Hall, Bobbie Chern, Laura Gustafson +4

Disaggregated performance metrics across demographic groups are a hallmark of fairness assessments in computer vision. These metrics successfully incentivized performance improveme…

cs.CV2023★ 4 cited

Vision-Language Models Performing Zero-Shot Tasks Exhibit Gender-based Disparities

Melissa Hall, Laura Gustafson, Aaron Adcock +2

We explore the extent to which zero-shot vision-language models exhibit gender bias for different vision tasks. Vision models traditionally required task-specific labels for repres…