23 citations · 30 across the 16 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
AgentBeats: Agentifying Agent Assessment for Openness, Standardization, and Reproducibility
Xiaoyuan Liu, Jianhong Tu, Yuqi Chen +26
Agent systems are advancing quickly across domains, but their evaluation remains fragmented. Most benchmarks rely on fixed, LLM-centric harnesses that require heavy integration, cr…
Every Eval Ever: A Unifying Schema and Community Repository for AI Evaluation Results
Jan Batzner, Sree Harsha Nelaturu, Damian Stachura +45
AI evaluations are widely used for testing and understanding progress. However, the diverse evaluators bring with them inconsistencies that challenge analysis and comparison. First…
CUBE: A Standard for Unifying Agent Benchmarks
Alexandre Lacoste, Nicolas Gontier, Oleh Shliazhko +23
The proliferation of agent benchmarks has created critical fragmentation that threatens research productivity. Each new benchmark requires substantial custom integration, creating…
ErrorMap and ErrorAtlas: Charting the Failure Landscape of Large Language Models
Shir Ashury-Tahan, Yifan Mai, Elron Bandel +2
Large Language Models (LLM) benchmarks tell us when models fail, but not why they fail. A wrong answer on a reasoning dataset may stem from formatting issues, calculation errors, o…
General Agent Evaluation
Elron Bandel, Asaf Yehudai, Lilach Eden +12
General-purpose agents perform tasks in unfamiliar environments without domain-specific manual customization. Yet no study has systematically measured how agent architecture shapes…