most citedTowards more patient friendly clinical notes through language models and ontologies

11 citations · 26 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2022

Consultation Checklists: Standardising the Human Evaluation of Medical Note Generation

Aleksandar Savkov, Francesco Moramarco, Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis +3

Evaluating automatically generated text is generally hard due to the inherently subjective nature of many aspects of the output quality. This difficulty is compounded in automatic…

cs.CL2022★ 3 cited

Human Evaluation and Correlation with Automatic Metrics in Consultation Note Generation

Francesco Moramarco, Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis, Mark Perera +5

In recent years, machine learning models have rapidly become better at generating clinical consultation notes; yet, there is little work on how to properly evaluate the generated c…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

PriMock57: A Dataset Of Primary Care Mock Consultations

Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis, Francesco Moramarco, Radmila Sarac +1

Recent advances in Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) have made it possible to reliably produce automatic transcripts of clinician-patient conversations. However, access to clinica…

cs.CL2021★ 11 cited

Towards more patient friendly clinical notes through language models and ontologies

Francesco Moramarco, Damir Juric, Aleksandar Savkov +8

Clinical notes are an efficient way to record patient information but are notoriously hard to decipher for non-experts. Automatically simplifying medical text can empower patients…

cs.CL2021★ 9 cited

A preliminary study on evaluating Consultation Notes with Post-Editing

Francesco Moramarco, Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis, Aleksandar Savkov +1

Automatic summarisation has the potential to aid physicians in streamlining clerical tasks such as note taking. But it is notoriously difficult to evaluate these systems and demons…