activity
20192026
most citedSubgroup Difference in Differences to Identify Effect Modification Without a Control Group

3 citations · 8 across the 17 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing stat.MEShow all

15 papers · 1 filter

stat.ME2026

Difference-in-Differences for Heterogeneous Effects of General Treatment Strategies Accounting for Time-Varying Covariates

Oliver Dukes, Zach Shahn, James Robins +1

We introduce a class of marginal Structural Nested Mean Models (mSNMMs) that enable modeling time-varying effect modification by a subset of covariates required as adjustment varia…

stat.ME2025

Identification and Estimation of Joint Potential Outcome Distributions from a Single Study

Zach Shahn, David Madigan

Most causal inference methods focus on estimating marginal average treatment effects, but many important causal estimands depend on the joint distribution of potential outcomes, in…

stat.ME2025

Structural Nested Mean Models for Modified Treatment Policies

Zach Shahn

There is a growing literature on estimating effects of treatment strategies based on the natural treatment that would have been received in the absence of intervention, often dubbe…

stat.ME2025

A Note on The Rationale Behind Using Parental Longevity as a Proxy in Mendelian Randomization Studies

Zach Shahn, Rehana Rasul, C. Mary Schooling

In many cohorts (such as the UK Biobank) on which Mendelian Randomization studies are routinely performed, data on participants' longevity is inadequate as the majority of particip…

stat.ME2025

Using causal diagrams to assess parallel trends in difference-in-differences studies

Audrey Renson, Oliver Dukes, Zach Shahn

Difference-in-differences (DID) is popular because it can allow for unmeasured confounding when the key assumption of parallel trends holds. However, there exists little guidance o…

stat.ME2024

Generalizing Difference-in-Differences to Non-Canonical Settings: Identifying an Array of Estimands

Zach Shahn, Laura Hatfield

Consider a general setting in which data on an outcome is collected in two `groups' at two time periods, with certain group-periods deemed `treated' and others `untreated'. A speci…

stat.ME2024

Structural Nested Mean Models Under Parallel Trends with Interference

Zach Shahn, Paul Zivich, Audrey Renson

Despite the common occurrence of interference in Difference-in-Differences (DiD) applications, standard DiD methods rely on an assumption that interference is absent, and comparati…

stat.ME2024

Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects on Survival Outcomes Using Counterfactual Censoring Unbiased Transformations

Shenbo Xu, Raluca Cobzaru, Stan N. Finkelstein +3

Methods for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) from observational data have largely focused on continuous or binary outcomes, with less attention paid to survival out…

stat.ME2023★ 3 cited

Subgroup Difference in Differences to Identify Effect Modification Without a Control Group

Zach Shahn

Suppose it is of interest to characterize effect heterogeneity of an intervention across levels of a baseline covariate using only pre- and post- intervention outcome measurements…

stat.ME2023★ 1 cited

Efficient estimation of weighted cumulative treatment effects by double/debiased machine learning

Shenbo Xu, Bang Zheng, Bowen Su +5

In empirical studies with time-to-event outcomes, investigators often leverage observational data to conduct causal inference on the effect of exposure when randomized controlled t…

stat.ME2022

When Do Outcome Driven Treatments Break Parallel Trends?

Zach Shahn

Under what circumstances is it a threat to the parallel trends assumption required for Difference in Differences (DiD) studies if treatment decisions are based on past values of th…

stat.ME2022★ 2 cited

Structural Nested Mean Models Under Parallel Trends Assumptions

Zach Shahn, Oliver Dukes, Meghana Shamsunder +3

We link and extend two approaches to estimating time-varying treatment effects on repeated continuous outcomes--time-varying Difference in Differences (DiD; see Roth et al. (2023)…

stat.ME2022

Using negative controls to identify causal effects with invalid instrumental variables

Oliver Dukes, David B. Richardson, Zachary Shahn +2

Many proposals for the identification of causal effects require an instrumental variable that satisfies strong, untestable unconfoundedness and exclusion restriction assumptions. I…

stat.ME2020

A Formal Causal Interpretation of the Case-Crossover Design

Zach Shahn, Miguel A. Hernan, James M. Robins

The case-crossover design (Maclure, 1991) is widely used in epidemiology and other fields to study causal effects of transient treatments on acute outcomes. However, its validity a…

stat.ME2019

Efficient estimation of optimal regimes under a no direct effect assumption

Lin Liu, Zach Shahn, James M. Robins +1

We derive new estimators of an optimal joint testing and treatment regime under the no direct effect (NDE) assumption that a given laboratory, diagnostic, or screening test has no…