activity
20182026
most citedExplainable Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs for Recommendation

80 citations · 211 across the 42 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.LGShow all

13 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2026

ARMOR: Stabilizing On-Policy LLM RL with Off-Policy Anchor Samples

Kexin Huang, Junkang Wu, Jinda Lu +7

Reinforcement learning (RL) has significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), yet the training process remains notoriously fragile. In this wor…

cs.LG2026

On the Direction of RLVR Updates for LLM Reasoning: Identification and Exploitation

Kexin Huang, Haoming Meng, Junkang Wu +10

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has substantially improved the reasoning capabilities of large language models. While existing analyses identify that RLVR-ind…

cs.LG2026

NExT-Guard: Training-Free Streaming Safeguard without Token-Level Labels

Junfeng Fang, Nachuan Chen, Houcheng Jiang +5

Large language models are increasingly deployed in streaming scenarios, rendering conventional post-hoc safeguards ineffective as they fail to interdict unsafe content in real-time…

cs.LG2025

MLLMEraser: Achieving Test-Time Unlearning in Multimodal Large Language Models through Activation Steering

Chenlu Ding, Jiancan Wu, Leheng Sheng +4

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across vision-language tasks, yet their large-scale deployment raises pressing concerns about mem…

cs.LG2025

Quantile Advantage Estimation: Stabilizing RLVR for LLM Reasoning

Junkang Wu, Kexin Huang, Jiancan Wu +3

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) strengthens LLM reasoning, but training often oscillates between {entropy collapse} and {entropy explosion}. We trace both haz…

cs.LG2025

Route Sparse Autoencoder to Interpret Large Language Models

Wei Shi, Sihang Li, Tao Liang +4

Mechanistic interpretability of large language models (LLMs) aims to uncover the internal processes of information propagation and reasoning. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have demons…

cs.LG2025

RePO: Understanding Preference Learning Through ReLU-Based Optimization

Junkang Wu, Kexin Huang, Xue Wang +5

Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is critical for real-world deployment, yet existing methods like RLHF face computational and stability challenges. Whil…

cs.LG2025

Larger or Smaller Reward Margins to Select Preferences for Alignment?

Kexin Huang, Junkang Wu, Ziqian Chen +6

Preference learning is critical for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values, with the quality of preference datasets playing a crucial role in this process. While e…

cs.LG2024

AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference Optimization

Junkang Wu, Xue Wang, Zhengyi Yang +5

Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values and intentions is crucial for their utility, honesty, and safety. Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a pop…

cs.LG2024

Towards Robust Alignment of Language Models: Distributionally Robustifying Direct Preference Optimization

Junkang Wu, Yuexiang Xie, Zhengyi Yang +6

This study addresses the challenge of noise in training datasets for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), a method for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

EXGC: Bridging Efficiency and Explainability in Graph Condensation

Junfeng Fang, Xinglin Li, Yongduo Sui +5

Graph representation learning on vast datasets, like web data, has made significant strides. However, the associated computational and storage overheads raise concerns. In sight of…

cs.LG2024★ 8 cited

Towards 3D Molecule-Text Interpretation in Language Models

Sihang Li, Zhiyuan Liu, Yanchen Luo +5

Language Models (LMs) have greatly influenced diverse domains. However, their inherent limitation in comprehending 3D molecular structures has considerably constrained their potent…

cs.LG2023★ 13 cited

Understanding Contrastive Learning via Distributionally Robust Optimization

Junkang Wu, Jiawei Chen, Jiancan Wu +3

This study reveals the inherent tolerance of contrastive learning (CL) towards sampling bias, wherein negative samples may encompass similar semantics (\eg labels). However, existi…