activity
20132026
most citedOn the Power of Invariant Tests for Hypotheses on a Covariance Matrix

5 citations · 15 across the 19 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

24 papers

econ.EM2026

Robust Instrumental Variables: Sharp Rates and Inference under Adversarial Contamination

Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer

Because 2SLS is built from sample averages, a small number of observations can have a disproportionate effect on estimates and inference. We introduce W-2SLS, a simple drop-in robu…

math.ST2026

Adversarially robust multiple testing in high dimensions

Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer

Robust multiple testing procedures for assessing equality restrictions on the coordinates of high-dimensional mean vectors are proposed. Our procedures are based on quantile-winsor…

math.ST2026

Robustness for free: asymptotic size and power of max-tests in high dimensions

Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer

Allowing for adversarial contamination and heavy tails, we study testing whether the mean of a high-dimensional random vector equals zero. Because standard max-tests based on sampl…

math.ST2025

Winsorized mean estimation with heavy tails and adversarial contamination

Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer

Finite-sample upper bounds on the estimation error of a winsorized mean estimator of the population mean in the presence of heavy tails and adversarial contamination are establishe…

math.ST2025

High-dimensional Gaussian and bootstrap approximations for robust means

Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer

Recent years have witnessed much progress on Gaussian and bootstrap approximations to the distribution of sums of independent random vectors with dimension large relative to th…

econ.EM2024

Enhanced power enhancements for testing many moment equalities: Beyond the - and -norm

Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer

Contemporary testing problems in statistics are increasingly complex, i.e., high-dimensional. Tests based on the - and -norm have received considerable attention in such…

econ.EM2024

Regularizing Fairness in Optimal Policy Learning with Distributional Targets

Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer

A decision maker typically (i) incorporates training data to learn about the relative effectiveness of treatments, and (ii) chooses an implementation mechanism that implies an ``op…

math.ST2023

A remark on moment-dependent phase transitions in high-dimensional Gaussian approximations

Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer

In this article, we study the critical growth rates of dimension below which Gaussian critical values can be used for hypothesis testing but beyond which they cannot. We are partic…

math.ST2022★ 1 cited

A Modern Gauss-Markov Theorem? Really?

Benedikt M. Pötscher, David Preinerstorfer

We show that the theorems in Hansen (2021a) (the version accepted by Econometrica), except for one, are not new as they coincide with classical theorems like the good old Gauss-Mar…

math.ST2021

Superconsistency of Tests in High Dimensions

Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer

To assess whether there is some signal in a big database, aggregate tests for the global null hypothesis of no effect are routinely applied in practice before more specialized anal…

math.ST2021★ 4 cited

Valid Heteroskedasticity Robust Testing

Benedikt M. Pötscher, David Preinerstorfer

Tests based on heteroskedasticity robust standard errors are an important technique in econometric practice. Choosing the right critical value, however, is not simple at all: conve…

math.ST2021

Consistency of -norm based tests in high dimensions: characterization, monotonicity, domination

Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer

Many commonly used test statistics are based on a norm measuring the evidence against the null hypothesis. To understand how the choice of a norm affects power properties of tests…

econ.EM2020

Treatment recommendation with distributional targets

Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer, Bezirgen Veliyev

We study the problem of a decision maker who must provide the best possible treatment recommendation based on an experiment. The desirability of the outcome distribution resulting…

math.ST2020

How Reliable are Bootstrap-based Heteroskedasticity Robust Tests?

Benedikt M. Pötscher, David Preinerstorfer

We develop theoretical finite-sample results concerning the size of wild bootstrap-based heteroskedasticity robust tests in linear regression models. In particular, these results p…

stat.ML2020★ 2 cited

Functional Sequential Treatment Allocation with Covariates

Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer, Bezirgen Veliyev

We consider a multi-armed bandit problem with covariates. Given a realization of the covariate vector, instead of targeting the treatment with highest conditional expectation, the…

math.ST2018★ 3 cited

How to avoid the zero-power trap in testing for correlation

David Preinerstorfer

In testing for correlation of the errors in regression models the power of tests can be very low for strongly correlated errors. This counterintuitive phenomenon has become known a…

econ.EM2018

Functional Sequential Treatment Allocation

Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer, Bezirgen Veliyev

Consider a setting in which a policy maker assigns subjects to treatments, observing each outcome before the next subject arrives. Initially, it is unknown which treatment is best,…

math.ST2017

Power in High-Dimensional Testing Problems

Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer

Fan et al. (2015) recently introduced a remarkable method for increasing asymptotic power of tests in high-dimensional testing problems. If applicable to a given test, their power…

math.ST2017

Further Results on Size and Power of Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Robust Tests, with an Application to Trend Testing

Benedikt M. Pötscher, David Preinerstorfer

We complement the theory developed in Preinerstorfer and Pötscher (2016) with further finite sample results on size and power of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation robust tests…

math.ST2016

Controlling the Size of Autocorrelation Robust Tests

Benedikt M. Pötscher, David Preinerstorfer

Autocorrelation robust tests are notorious for suffering from size distortions and power problems. We investigate under which conditions the size of autocorrelation robust tests ca…

math.ST2016

Uniformly valid confidence intervals post-model-selection

François Bachoc, David Preinerstorfer, Lukas Steinberger

We suggest general methods to construct asymptotically uniformly valid confidence intervals post-model-selection. The constructions are based on principles recently proposed by Ber…

math.ST2014

Finite Sample Properties of Tests Based on Prewhitened Nonparametric Covariance Estimators

David Preinerstorfer

We analytically investigate size and power properties of a popular family of procedures for testing linear restrictions on the coefficient vector in a linear regression model with…

math.ST2014★ 5 cited

On the Power of Invariant Tests for Hypotheses on a Covariance Matrix

David Preinerstorfer, Benedikt M. Pötscher

The behavior of the power function of autocorrelation tests such as the Durbin-Watson test in time series regressions or the Cliff-Ord test in spatial regression models has been in…

math.ST2013

On Size and Power of Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Robust Tests

David Preinerstorfer, Benedikt M. Pötscher

Testing restrictions on regression coefficients in linear models often requires correcting the conventional F-test for potential heteroskedasticity or autocorrelation amongst the d…