activity
20182026
most citedThe Touché23-ValueEval Dataset for Identifying Human Values behind Arguments

22 citations · 33 across the 17 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2021Show all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2021

Assessing the Sufficiency of Arguments through Conclusion Generation

Timon Gurcke, Milad Alshomary, Henning Wachsmuth

The premises of an argument give evidence or other reasons to support a conclusion. However, the amount of support required depends on the generality of a conclusion, the nature of…

cs.CL2021

Key Point Analysis via Contrastive Learning and Extractive Argument Summarization

Milad Alshomary, Timon Gurcke, Shahbaz Syed +5

Key point analysis is the task of extracting a set of concise and high-level statements from a given collection of arguments, representing the gist of these arguments. This paper p…

cs.CL2021★ 2 cited

Generating Informative Conclusions for Argumentative Texts

Shahbaz Syed, Khalid Al-Khatib, Milad Alshomary +2

The purpose of an argumentative text is to support a certain conclusion. Yet, they are often omitted, expecting readers to infer them rather. While appropriate when reading an indi…

cs.CL2021★ 2 cited

Argument Undermining: Counter-Argument Generation by Attacking Weak Premises

Milad Alshomary, Shahbaz Syed, Arkajit Dhar +2

Text generation has received a lot of attention in computational argumentation research as of recent. A particularly challenging task is the generation of counter-arguments. So far…

cs.CL2021

Belief-based Generation of Argumentative Claims

Milad Alshomary, Wei-Fan Chen, Timon Gurcke +1

When engaging in argumentative discourse, skilled human debaters tailor claims to the beliefs of the audience, to construct effective arguments. Recently, the field of computationa…