activity
20192023
most citedHow Discriminative Are Your Qrels? How To Study the Statistical Significance of Document Adjudication Methods

22 citations · 46 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.IR2023★ 22 cited

How Discriminative Are Your Qrels? How To Study the Statistical Significance of Document Adjudication Methods

David Otero, Javier Parapar, Nicola Ferro

Creating test collections for offline retrieval evaluation requires human effort to judge documents' relevance. This expensive activity motivated much work in developing methods fo…

cs.CL2023★ 3 cited

DepreSym: A Depression Symptom Annotated Corpus and the Role of LLMs as Assessors of Psychological Markers

Anxo Pérez, Marcos Fernández-Pichel, Javier Parapar +1

Computational methods for depression detection aim to mine traces of depression from online publications posted by Internet users. However, solutions trained on existing collection…

cs.IR2023★ 1 cited

Keyword Embeddings for Query Suggestion

Jorge Gabín, M. Eduardo Ares, Javier Parapar

Nowadays, search engine users commonly rely on query suggestions to improve their initial inputs. Current systems are very good at recommending lexical adaptations or spelling corr…

cs.CL2022

Semantic Similarity Models for Depression Severity Estimation

Anxo Pérez, Neha Warikoo, Kexin Wang +2

Depressive disorders constitute a severe public health issue worldwide. However, public health systems have limited capacity for case detection and diagnosis. In this regard, the w…

cs.IR2019★ 20 cited

Using Score Distributions to Compare Statistical Significance Tests for Information Retrieval Evaluation

Javier Parapar, David E. Losada, Manuel A. Presedo-Quindimil +1

Statistical significance tests can provide evidence that the observed difference in performance between two methods is not due to chance. In Information Retrieval, some studies hav…