5 citations · 12 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for
8 papers · 1 filter
Powers of planar graphs, product structure, and blocking partitions
Marc Distel, Robert Hickingbotham, Michał T. Seweryn +1
We prove that the -power of any planar graph is contained in for some graph with bounded treewidth, some path , and some functio…
Pathwidth vs cocircumference
Marcin Briański, Gwenaël Joret, Michał T. Seweryn
The {\em circumference} of a graph with at least one cycle is the length of a longest cycle in . A classic result of Birmelé (2003) states that the treewidth of is at mo…
Edge separators for graphs excluding a minor
Gwenaël Joret, William Lochet, Michał T. Seweryn
We prove that every -vertex -minor-free graph of maximum degree has a set of edges such that every component of has at m…
Product structure extension of the Alon--Seymour--Thomas theorem
Marc Distel, Vida Dujmović, David Eppstein +6
Alon, Seymour and Thomas [1990] proved that every -vertex graph excluding as a minor has treewidth less than . Illingworth, Scott and Wood [2022] recently…
Three-dimensional graph products with unbounded stack-number
David Eppstein, Robert Hickingbotham, Laura Merker +3
We prove that the stack-number of the strong product of three -vertex paths is . The best previously known upper bound was . No non-trivial lower bound was kno…
Erdős-Hajnal properties for powers of sparse graphs
Marcin Briański, Piotr Micek, Michał Pilipczuk +1
We prove that for every nowhere dense class of graphs , positive integer , and , the following holds: in every -vertex graph from $\mathcal{C}…
Excluding a ladder
Tony Huynh, Gwenaël Joret, Piotr Micek +2
A ladder is a grid graph. When does a graph class exclude some ladder as a minor? We show that this is the case if and only if all graphs in $\mathca…
Improved bound for the dimension of posets of treewidth two
Michał T. Seweryn
Joret et al. proved that posets with cover graphs of treewidth at most 2 have dimension at most 1276. Their proof is long and very complex. We give a short and much simpler proof t…