activity
20192024
most citedMulti-Objective Multi-Agent Decision Making: A Utility-based Analysis and Survey

132 citations · 208 across the 17 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2021Show all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.AI2021★ 6 cited

Scalar reward is not enough: A response to Silver, Singh, Precup and Sutton (2021)

Peter Vamplew, Benjamin J. Smith, Johan Kallstrom +9

The recent paper `"Reward is Enough" by Silver, Singh, Precup and Sutton posits that the concept of reward maximisation is sufficient to underpin all intelligence, both natural and…

cs.LG2021★ 7 cited

Expected Scalarised Returns Dominance: A New Solution Concept for Multi-Objective Decision Making

Conor F. Hayes, Timothy Verstraeten, Diederik M. Roijers +2

In many real-world scenarios, the utility of a user is derived from the single execution of a policy. In this case, to apply multi-objective reinforcement learning, the expected ut…

cs.AI2021★ 19 cited

A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planning

Conor F. Hayes, Roxana Rădulescu, Eugenio Bargiacchi +15

Real-world decision-making tasks are generally complex, requiring trade-offs between multiple, often conflicting, objectives. Despite this, the majority of research in reinforcemen…

cs.LG2021★ 6 cited

Risk Aware and Multi-Objective Decision Making with Distributional Monte Carlo Tree Search

Conor F. Hayes, Mathieu Reymond, Diederik M. Roijers +2

In many risk-aware and multi-objective reinforcement learning settings, the utility of the user is derived from the single execution of a policy. In these settings, making decision…

cs.MA2021★ 2 cited

Exploring the Impact of Tunable Agents in Sequential Social Dilemmas

David O'Callaghan, Patrick Mannion

When developing reinforcement learning agents, the standard approach is to train an agent to converge to a fixed policy that is as close to optimal as possible for a single fixed r…